§Why CasetextPricing

Elliot v. Ward et al

RESPONSE in Opposition re MOTION for Attorney Fees Shareholder Dale Hefner's Contingent Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses and Brief in Support and

9 Cited authorities

  1. Staton v. Boeing Co.

    327 F.3d 938 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 2,007 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "named plaintiffs ... are eligible for reasonable incentive payments" in addition to reimbursement "for their substantiated litigation expenses, and identifiable services rendered to the class directly under the supervision of class counsel"

  2. Siloam Springs Hotel, L.L.C. v. Century Sur. Co.

    781 F.3d 1233 (10th Cir. 2015)   Cited 617 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an LLC takes the citizenship of all its members

  3. Rodriguez v. Disner

    688 F.3d 645 (9th Cir. 2012)   Cited 134 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding that objectors conferred a benefit on the class warranting an award of attorney's fees where their objections were instrumental in causing the district court to deny fees to class counsel

  4. McKinnie v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

    678 F. Supp. 2d 806 (E.D. Wis. 2009)   Cited 18 times
    Finding that lack of opposition supports settlement where approximately "1,200 class members filed claims in response to the settlement notice not a single person opted out of the class and only two objections were filed."

  5. Egelhof v. Szulik

    193 N.C. App. 612 (N.C. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 7 times

    No. COA08-452. Filed 18 November 2008. 1. Constitutional Law" due process — sanctions — notice and opportunity to be heard Plaintiff and plaintiff's counsel were not denied due process in the imposition of non-monetary sanctions based on their pleadings in a shareholder derivative action against corporate officers where they received notice that sanctions were being sought and of the basis of those sanctions, and were given the opportunity to present arguments and testimony on their behalf. 2. Pleadings"

  6. In re Riverbed Tech., Inc.

    Civil Action No. 10484-VCG (Del. Ch. Dec. 2, 2015)   Cited 1 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Awarding an objector $10,837.00 in attorney's fees and costs where the objector produced a modest benefit to the class by reviewing the record closely, reviewing proposed settlement and case law, and drafting briefing in opposition of the settlement

  7. La. Mun. Police Employees' Ret. Sys. v. McClendon

    307 P.3d 393 (Okla. Civ. App. 2013)   Cited 2 times

    No. 110426. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1. 2013-05-23 LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Louisiana School Employees Retirement System, New Orleans Employees' Retirement System, Firefighters Pension and Relief Fund for the City of New Orleans, and the York County Employees' Retirement System, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. Aubrey McCLENDON, Richard Davidson, Pete Miller, Frank Keating, Breene Kerr, Charles Maxwell, Donald

  8. In re Intel Corp. Derivative Litigation

    Civil Act. No. 09-867-JJF (D. Del. Jul. 22, 2010)   Cited 3 times

    Civil Act. No. 09-867-JJF. July 22, 2010 Robert D. Goldberg, Esquire of BIGGS BATTAGLIA, Wilmington, Delaware. Lead Attorneys for Plaintiff Charles Gilman and Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System. Laurence D. Paskowitz, Esquire of PASKOWITZ ASSOCIATES, New York, New York. Jeffrey C. Block, Esquire; Bryan A. Wood, Esquire and Scott A. Mays, Esquire of BERMAN DEVALERIO, Boston, Massachusetts. Co-Lead Attorneys for Plaintiff Charles Gilman and Louisiana Municipal Police Employees'

  9. Section 8106 - Actions subject to 3-year limitation

    Del. Code tit. 10 § 8106   Cited 872 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Specifying causes of action subject to 3-year statute of limitations as including "action to recover damages caused by an injury unaccompanied with force or resulting indirectly from the act of the defendant"