38 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Bestfoods

    524 U.S. 51 (1998)   Cited 1,191 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that ownership and control is insufficient to demonstrate an alter-ego relationship
  2. Robinson v. Reed-Prentice

    49 N.Y.2d 471 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 401 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the defendant was not strictly liable for defective design where evidence established that when the defendant sold the molding machine, the machine was not defective, and had the machine been left intact, the machine's safety gate and connecting interlocks would have rendered the predicate accident an impossibility
  3. Billy v. Consolidated Mach

    51 N.Y.2d 152 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 329 times
    Rejecting "dual-capacity" exception to Workers' Compensation Law
  4. Godoy v. Abamaster of Miami

    302 A.D.2d 57 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)   Cited 174 times
    Finding that distributors held strictly liable to end-user were “innocent conduit in the sale of the defective product” and that “[o]ne who is liable for an injury by imputation of law may seek common-law indemnity from a person primarily liable for the injury”
  5. Conason v. Megan Holding, LLC

    2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 1553 (N.Y. 2015)   Cited 120 times
    Making no mention of "decisiveness" formulation
  6. Mondello v. N Y Blood Center

    80 N.Y.2d 219 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 184 times
    Finding that a nondelegable duty did not exist where the hospital did not hold itself out as having screened blood for contagious disease or furnish any personnel for that purpose. The plaintiff's subjective belief is not enough to impose liability upon the hospital for the acts of an independent contractor.
  7. Caprara v. Chrysler Corp.

    52 N.Y.2d 114 (N.Y. 1981)   Cited 230 times
    Finding that a manufacturing defect in a product is one which results from a mistake or error made during the manufacturing process
  8. Yoder v. Honeywell Inc.

    104 F.3d 1215 (10th Cir. 1997)   Cited 124 times
    Upholding dismissal, based on New York statute of limitations, of defendant who had only pleaded Colorado statute of limitations
  9. Balintulo v. Ford Motor Co.

    796 F.3d 160 (2d Cir. 2015)   Cited 67 times
    Holding motion to dismiss properly granted where complaint contained no "plausible allegations . . . that would form any basis for us to pierce [parent company's] corporate veil" or any "extraordinary circumstances" which would allow the court to ignore the subsidiary's separate legal status
  10. Sukljian v. Ross Son Co.

    69 N.Y.2d 89 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 144 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a retailer may be held liable under a strict liability theory for injuries from defective products sold by that retailer