§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Brian Novak, Appellant.

Brief

69 Cited authorities

  1. Brady v. Maryland

    373 U.S. 83 (1963)   Cited 43,423 times   133 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the prosecution violates due process when it suppresses material, favorable evidence

  2. United States v. Agurs

    427 U.S. 97 (1976)   Cited 7,515 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that materiality "must be evaluated in the context of the entire record"

  3. McDaniel v. Brown

    558 U.S. 120 (2010)   Cited 1,240 times
    Holding that a court reviewing a conviction for sufficiency "must consider all of the evidence admitted at trial, regardless of whether that evidence was admitted erroneously"

  4. Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co.

    556 U.S. 868 (2009)   Cited 868 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that state-court-appellate judge should have recused himself from appeal as matter of due process

  5. People v. Contes

    60 N.Y.2d 620 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 11,959 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stating the standard for review of the legal sufficiency of evidence in a criminal case is whether "after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt"

  6. In re Murchison

    349 U.S. 133 (1955)   Cited 2,115 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it violated due process for one adjudicator to act as grand jury and judge for same defendants

  7. Mayberry v. Pennsylvania

    400 U.S. 455 (1971)   Cited 611 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a judge who charged a litigant with contempt for salacious personal attacks could not preside over the litigant's contempt proceedings because "[n]o one so cruelly slandered is likely to maintain that calm detachment necessary for fair adjudication"

  8. People v. Hines

    97 N.Y.2d 56 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 710 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in a post-verdict CPL § 330.30 motion, "an insufficiency argument may not be addressed unless it has been properly reserved for review during the trial"

  9. Tumey v. Ohio

    273 U.S. 510 (1927)   Cited 2,137 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Due Process Clause requires recusal when a judge has a "direct, personal, substantial pecuniary interest" in a case

  10. Offutt v. United States

    348 U.S. 11 (1954)   Cited 730 times
    Holding that heavy sanctions, which were later reduced by a higher court, constituted “compelling proof” of bias

  11. Section 455 - Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge

    28 U.S.C. § 455   Cited 11,026 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Setting forth standards of recusal

  12. Section 47 - Disqualification of trial judge to hear appeal

    28 U.S.C. § 47   Cited 216 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Amending Act June 18, 1910, 36 Stat. 519

  13. Section 100.3 - A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially and diligently

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 100.3   Cited 250 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing that a judge in New York "shall require order and decorum in proceedings before" him