§Why CasetextPricing

Edward Lewis Tobinick, MD et al v. Novella et al

REPLY to Response to Motion re Motion for Reconsideration

2 Cited authorities

  1. White v. Davis

    13 Cal.3d 757 (Cal. 1975)   Cited 290 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding in the legislative history at least four “mischiefs” the amendment was intended to address, including “the improper use of information properly obtained for a specific purpose, for example ... the disclosure of it to some third party”

  2. Central Valley Chapter of 7th Step Foundation, Inc. v. Younger

    214 Cal.App.3d 145 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989)   Cited 12 times
    Noting that the Department of Justice "must exercise great care" with criminal history information because of "inaccurate or incomplete arrest records, and dissemination of criminal records outside the criminal justice system"