§Why CasetextPricing

Edelman v. Page, et al

Memorandum in Opposition re MOTION to Reopen Case, 69 MOTION to Reopen Case

3 Cited authorities

  1. State v. Edelman

    64 Conn. App. 480 (Conn. App. Ct. 2001)   Cited 9 times
    Concluding that defendant was subject to criminal liability for violation of Connecticut's uniform building code without a showing of culpable intent

  2. State v. Edelman

    262 Conn. 392 (Conn. 2003)   Cited 6 times

    (SC 16623) Argued January 6 Officially released February 18, 2003 Procedural History Amended information charging the defendant with violation of the state building code, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Windham, geographical area number eleven, and tried to the jury before Foley, J.; verdict and judgment of guilty, from which the defendant appealed to the Appellate Court, Lavery, C.J., and Foti and Hennessy, Js., which reversed the trial court's judgment and remanded the

  3. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,753 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system