§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Roseann Kilduff, Respondent,v.Rochester City School District, et al., Appellants.

Brief

8 Cited authorities

  1. DaimlerChrysler v. Spitzer

    7 N.Y.3d 653 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 226 times
    In Spitzer, James Warner bought a new truck manufactured by General Motors Corporation in March 2003. Shortly after acquiring the truck, Warner discovered a transmission problem and attempted to have the problem fixed on five occasions between April and November 2003.

  2. Long v. State

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 5231 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 113 times
    In Long v State of New York, 7 NY3d 269, 276 (2006), the Court of Appeals dismissed an unjust conviction claim because it was verified by counsel, not personally by the claimant, citing subdivision 4 and also quoting the 1984 Report of the Law Revision Commission that a claim "must be personally verified."

  3. Long v. Adirondack Park

    76 N.Y.2d 416 (N.Y. 1990)   Cited 69 times
    Rejecting a construction based on the rule of the last antecedent because it ran contrary to the purpose, intent, and overall structure of the statute

  4. Professional Staff Congress-City University v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board

    7 N.Y.3d 458 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 31 times

    No. 91. Argued September 6, 2006. Decided October 17, 2006. APPEALS, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, entered June 7, 2005, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division by order of the Supreme Court, entered in New York County). The Appellate Division granted the petition to set aside a determination of respondent New York State Public Employment Relations Board

  5. McGaffin v. City of Cohoes

    74 N.Y. 387 (N.Y. 1878)   Cited 10 times

    Argued June 19, 1878 Decided September 17, 1878 Matthew Hale, for appellant. N.P. Hinman, for respondent. CHURCH, Ch. J. This action is claimed to be barred by the limitation of one year prescribed in the charter of the defendant. (Laws of 1869, p. 2383.) The last clause of section 5 of title 13 of the charter reads as follows: "And no action against the city on a contract obligation or liability express or implied, shall be commenced except within one year after the cause of action shall have accrued

  6. Section 5602 - Appeals to the court of appeals by permission

    N.Y. CPLR 5602   Cited 1,154 times
    Discussing appeals by permission to New York Court of Appeals

  7. Section 3020-A - Disciplinary procedures and penalties

    N.Y. Educ. Law § 3020-A   Cited 919 times
    Applying to "person enjoying the benefits of tenure"

  8. Section 3020 - Discipline of teachers

    N.Y. Educ. Law § 3020   Cited 156 times

    1. No person enjoying the benefits of tenure shall be disciplined or removed during a term of employment except for just cause and in accordance with the procedures specified in section three thousand twenty-a of this article or in accordance with alternate disciplinary procedures contained in a collective bargaining agreement covering his or her terms and conditions of employment that was effective on or before September first, nineteen hundred ninety-four and has been unaltered by renegotiation