§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, Respondent,v.Seth Rubenstein, Appellant. (And Another Action.)

Brief

19 Cited authorities

  1. Coleman v. Daines

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7222 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 113 times
    Discussing a "hybrid CPLR article 78 proceeding and 42 USC § 1983 action"

  2. Green v. Montgomery

    95 N.Y.2d 693 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 121 times
    Holding that juvenile offender may not turn "the shield of the privilege into a sword."

  3. In Matter of M.B.

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 2235 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 85 times
    In Matter of M.B., 6 N.Y.3d 437, 447, 813 N.Y.S.2d 349, 846 N.E.2d 794 [2006], the Court of Appeals clarified this undertaking.

  4. Matter of Hynes v. Karassik

    47 N.Y.2d 659 (N.Y. 1979)   Cited 170 times
    Affirming Appellate Division's order preventing official records and papers pertaining to a criminal trial in which an attorney had been acquitted from being unsealed for use in a subsequent investigation into the attorney's fitness to practice law

  5. Matter of Bickwid v. Deutsch

    87 N.Y.2d 862 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 76 times

    Argued November 29, 1995 Decided December 21, 1995 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, David Freundlich, J. Schapiro Reich, Lindenhurst (Perry S. Reich, Steven M. Schapiro and Wilma Kerner Miller, of counsel), for appellant. Respondent, precluded. MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the proceeding remitted to the Appellate Division for a determination on the merits. Appellant, an accountant and

  6. Matter of Newspapers v. Leggett

    48 N.Y.2d 430 (N.Y. 1979)   Cited 121 times
    Ruling that, absent particularized showing and findings establishing likelihood of harm to some other compelling interest, pretrial competency hearing in criminal case is presumptively open

  7. Katherine B. v. Cataldo

    5 N.Y.3d 196 (N.Y. 2005)   Cited 55 times
    Holding that N.Y. C.P.L. § 160.50 did not permit a prosecutor to have a record unsealed merely upon an ex parte motion demonstrating that justice so required

  8. Matter of Dondi

    63 N.Y.2d 331 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 99 times

    Argued September 13, 1984 Decided October 25, 1984 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department. Oren Root, Jr., and Patrick M. Wall for appellant. Robert H. Straus for respondent. Per Curiam. During the course of an investigation in an attorney disciplinary matter, the Grievance Committee may, upon an affirmation demonstrating necessity, gain an order from the Appellate Division permitting the unsealing of the records of a criminal action previously sealed

  9. Matter of Joseph M

    82 N.Y.2d 128 (N.Y. 1993)   Cited 69 times
    Describing that purpose as “protecting exonerated individuals from the unwarranted stigma ... others could attach to dismissed criminal charges”

  10. Bezio v. Dorsey

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 3118 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 26 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that "[h]ad [certain] issues been merely unpreserved, that, of course, would not have prevented the Appellate Division from reaching and deciding them in the exercise of its interests of justice power"; the problem was that the unpreserved issues were also moot and thus the Appellate Division essentially issued an advisory opinion