37 Cited authorities

Feinstein v. Bergner
48 N.Y.2d 234 (N.Y. 1979) Cited 339 times
Holding that subsequent knowledge of the lawsuit was nonetheless insufficient where the Defendant was never properly served
Cannon v. Putnam
76 N.Y.2d 644 (N.Y. 1990) Cited 181 times
In Cannon, "the defendant decided to have a free standing floodlight installed on his property to illuminate his front yard and its two artificial ponds."
Fashion Page v. Zurich Ins. Co.
50 N.Y.2d 265 (N.Y. 1980) Cited 230 times
Holding that, under C.P.L.R. § 311, a plaintiff may rely on "corporate employees to identify the proper person to accept service" and that service on the secretary for the defendant's vice president, who had held herself out as authorized to receive service, was sufficient to support proper service on the corporation
Yuppie Puppy Prods. v. Street Smart
77 A.D.3d 197 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010) Cited 97 times
No. 3194. August 17, 2010. APPEAL from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered December 4, 2008. The order denied the motion of the proposed intervenors for permission to intervene in the action. Winston Strawn LLC, New York City ( Christopher J. Paolella, Joseph DiBenedetto and Christopher Costello of counsel), for appellants. Alan M. Goldston, Scarsdale, for Yuppie Puppy respondents. Abraham Borenstein Associates, P.C., New York City ( Abraham Borenstein and
Skyline v. Coppotelli, Inc.
117 A.D.2d 135 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986) Cited 188 times
In Skyline, Id. the Coppotellis, Dominic and Frank, were brothers and with Alphonse, the father, were equal shareholders in their company.
Assured Guaranty
80 A.D.3d 293 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010) Cited 70 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that gross negligence and breach of fiduciary duty are not preempted by the Martin Act
Frankel v. Schilling
149 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989) Cited 124 times
April 24, 1989 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.). Ordered that the appeal from the order dated November 6, 1987, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated January 12, 1988, made upon reargument; and it is further, Ordered that the order dated January 12, 1988, is reversed insofar as appealed from, the order dated November 6, 1987, is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for a hearing to determine whether process was
People v. Caviness
38 N.Y.2d 227 (N.Y. 1975) Cited 173 times
In People v Caviness (38 N.Y.2d 227), the witness was permitted to testify about a statement she had made at the time of the crime as an excited utterance.
John Galliano, S.A. v. Stallion, Inc.
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 4829 (N.Y. 2010) Cited 48 times
Stating that nonrecognition is appropriate where exercise of jurisdiction by foreign court does not comport with "New York's concept of personal jurisdiction"
McGuirk v. Pub
250 A.D.2d 824 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998) Cited 44 times
May 26, 1998 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.) Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. On November 9, 1993, the plaintiff's process server visited the defendant Mugs Pub, the site of the alleged accident, to serve a summons and complaint on its Finding only a bartender there, the process server left the establishment and walked outside to the parking lot where his car was parked. There, he saw a man wearing a white shirt and black pants. It is undisputed that
Section 500.1 - General requirements
N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.1 Cited 1 times
(a) All papers shall comply with applicable statutes and rules, particularly the signing requirement of section 130-1.1 -a of this Title. (b) Papers filed. Papers filed means briefs, papers submitted pursuant to sections 500.10 and 500.11 of this Part, motion papers, records and appendices. (c) Method of reproduction. All papers filed may be reproduced by any method that produces a permanent, legible, black image on white paper. Reproduction on both sides of the paper is encouraged. (d) Designation

Landauer Limited, Appellant,v.Joe Monani Fish Co., Inc., Respondent.

37 Cited authorities

Holding that subsequent knowledge of the lawsuit was nonetheless insufficient where the Defendant was never properly served

In Cannon, "the defendant decided to have a free standing floodlight installed on his property to illuminate his front yard and its two artificial ponds."

In Skyline, Id. the Coppotellis, Dominic and Frank, were brothers and with Alphonse, the father, were equal shareholders in their company.

Holding that gross negligence and breach of fiduciary duty are not preempted by the Martin Act

In People v Caviness (38 N.Y.2d 227), the witness was permitted to testify about a statement she had made at the time of the crime as an excited utterance.

Stating that nonrecognition is appropriate where exercise of jurisdiction by foreign court does not comport with "New York's concept of personal jurisdiction"