§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Anthony Lewis, Appellant.

Brief

15 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Stultz

    2 N.Y.3d 277 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 3,233 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding "a defendant's showing of prejudice [to be] a significant but not indispensable element in assessing meaningful representation," focusing instead on "the fairness of the proceedings as a whole"

  2. People v. Alejandro

    70 N.Y.2d 133 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 1,217 times
    Reviewing the legislature's intent to create a "demanding standard" for the sufficiency of informations

  3. People v. Jennings

    69 N.Y.2d 103 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 763 times
    In Jennings, the president of the insured (Sentry) received a check from Sentry's insurer to cover payments owed to the Sentry's clients as a result of losses incurred when the Sentry's warehouse was robbed.

  4. Government of Virgin Islands v. Forte

    865 F.2d 59 (3d Cir. 1989)   Cited 626 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that even though Batson had not been decided, counsel's failure to object to improper use of peremptory challenges was unreasonable

  5. People v. Weaver

    2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 3762 (N.Y. 2009)   Cited 126 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding use of GPS device to track suspect for 65 days was search

  6. People v. Alamo

    34 N.Y.2d 453 (N.Y. 1974)   Cited 130 times
    In People v Alamo (34 N.Y.2d 453, 457) the high court said: "It is woven into the fabric of the common law that asportation is an element of a completed larceny" but then, after examining the current Penal Law (§ 155.05), the court concluded, "[t]here is nothing in the definitions section which states that asportation is in all cases an essential element of * * * taking or obtaining" (p 460).

  7. People v. Sanchez

    84 N.Y.2d 440 (N.Y. 1994)   Cited 56 times
    In Sanchez, the New York Court of Appeals found that the defendant had committed a continuing offense because his impersonation of an FBI agent for a period of five years constituted a pattern of criminal behavior.

  8. People v. Nesbitt

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 1990 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 20 times
    In Nesbitt, defense counsel gave no defense for an assault in the first degree and did not request an instruction for a lesser included offense, later arguing to the jury that (while it should find defendant not guilty on another offense) the jury could make its own decision on the assault count, 20 N.Y.3d at 1081, 965 N.Y.S.2d at 744.

  9. People v. Miller

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 2127 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 16 times

    2012-03-22 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Jeffery H. MILLER, Respondent. Michael C. Green, District Attorney, Rochester (Geoffrey Kaeuper of counsel), for appellant. Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender, Rochester (Drew R. DuBrin of counsel), for respondent. SMITH Michael C. Green, District Attorney, Rochester (Geoffrey Kaeuper of counsel), for appellant. Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender, Rochester (Drew R. DuBrin of counsel), for respondent. OPINION OF THE COURT SMITH, J. [1]

  10. People v. Cole

    85 N.Y.2d 990 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 36 times
    Finding that the depraved indifference murder statute was not unconstitutionally vague because "conduct with `depraved indifference' to `human life' . . . is the kind of [conduct] which has been rather well understood" and the statute specifically delineates the types and levels of risks that are to be avoided