Holding that, under federal law, national parent bank may be sued in personam and, once such jurisdiction is obtained, a court can order attachment of property in a foreign branch bank; this is because "[o]nce personal jurisdiction of a party is obtained, the District Court has authority to `freeze' property under [the party's] control, whether the property be within or without the United States"
21 A.D.2d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964) Cited 234 times
In Rios, this court distinguished between disclosure by discovery and inspection sought pursuant to CPLR 3120 from the limited discovery available under CPLR 3111 and observed that the hallmark of discovery permitted by CPLR 3120 "is a specific designation in the notice."
In Allied Maritime, Inc. v. Descatrade SA, 620 F. 3d 70 (2d Cir. 2010), the court relied on the separate entity rule to hold that it lacked jurisdiction over a bank account in France based on "the mere fact that a bank may have a branch within New York."
Fed. R. Civ. P. 34 Cited 9,219 times 105 Legal Analyses
Finding that the rules related to electronic discovery were "not meant to create a routine right of direct access to a party's electronic information system, although such access may be justified in some circumstances."