§Why CasetextPricing

James Square Associates LP, et al., Respondents,v.Dennis Mullen, Commissioner New York State Department of Economic Development, et al., Appellants.

Brief

30 Cited authorities

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film Prods.

    511 U.S. 244 (1994)   Cited 3,796 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statute may apply retroactively when "clear congressional intent favor such a result"

  2. Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel

    524 U.S. 498 (1998)   Cited 556 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that levying Coal Act premiums on a pre-1978 signatory operator was an unconstitutional taking because the operator never agreed to provide lifetime benefits to its retirees

  3. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. R. A. Gray Co.

    467 U.S. 717 (1984)   Cited 759 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that retroactive aspects of legislation must satisfy due process, a burden "met simply by showing that the retroactive application of the legislation is itself justified by a rational legislative purpose"

  4. Oregon v. Hass

    420 U.S. 714 (1975)   Cited 1,012 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statements obtained in violation of Miranda, though excluded from the prosecution's case-in-chief, may be used to impeach the defendant's testimony if otherwise voluntary

  5. General Motors Corp. v. Romein

    503 U.S. 181 (1992)   Cited 545 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding there was no contractual relationship regarding the statutory terms at issue, and therefore no violation of the Contract Clause

  6. United States v. Carlton

    512 U.S. 26 (1994)   Cited 181 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding no violation of due process where retroactive application of a legislative amendment is "rationally related to a legitimate legislative purpose"

  7. United States v. Darusmont

    449 U.S. 292 (1981)   Cited 109 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the permissible period of retroactivity for federal taxation statutes "has been confined to short and limited periods required by the practicalities of producing national legislation."

  8. Welch v. Henry

    305 U.S. 134 (1938)   Cited 343 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Wisconsin law providing for retroactive application of graduated tax on dividends

  9. People v. Singer

    44 N.Y.2d 241 (N.Y. 1978)   Cited 328 times
    Providing a defendant with a pre-trial hearing to determine whether a pre-indictment delay was reasonable

  10. People v. Isaacson

    44 N.Y.2d 511 (N.Y. 1978)   Cited 237 times
    Holding conviction based on police misconduct and trickery to secure drug sales violates due process

  11. Section 11.9 - Revocation of certification

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 5 § 11.9   Cited 15 times

    (a) The commissioner may revoke the certification of a business enterprise upon a finding of any one of the following: (1) the business enterprise made material misrepresentations of fact on its application for certification or on a business annual report, or the business enterprise failed to disclose facts in its application for certification that would constitute grounds for not issuing a certification; (2) the business enterprise has failed to construct, expand, rehabilitate, invest in or operate