5 Cited authorities

  1. Cardenas v. Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.

    231 F.R.D. 616 (D. Kan. 2005)   Cited 28 times
    Finding "the fact that [the interrogatory] seeks information about multiple alleged design defects does not turn it into multiple interrogatories."
  2. Jacks v. Directsat USA, LLC

    Case No. 10 C 1707 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 1, 2011)   Cited 2 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Case No. 10 C 1707. February 1, 2011 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOAN GOTTSCHALL, District Judge The plaintiffs ask the court to compel the defendants to: (1) produce complete responses to Plaintiffs' Interrogatories Nos. 9, 10, and 14-22, (2) identify whether documents have already been produced in response to the plaintiffs' document requests and, if so, identify those documents by bates stamp number, and (3) conduct the proposed email key word search and produce responsive emails. II. ANALYSIS

  3. Holmes v. Trustees of Purdue University

    Case No. 4:06 CV 114 (N.D. Ind. Mar. 5, 2008)   Cited 2 times

    Case No. 4:06 CV 114. March 5, 2008 OPINION AND ORDER ANDREW RODOVICH, Magistrate Judge This matter is before the court on the Motion to Extend Deadlines, Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Discovery Responses and Deposition of Plaintiff filed by the defendants, Trustees of Purdue University, Debra J. Steiner, and William Miller, M.D., on January 29, 2008. (DE 50, 52) For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Background The parties generally agree upon an extension

  4. Rule 11 - Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to the Court; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 11   Cited 27,412 times   107 Legal Analyses
    Holding an "unrepresented party" to the same standard as an attorney
  5. Rule 33 - Interrogatories to Parties

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 33   Cited 8,593 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Rule 30(b)