§Why CasetextPricing

DynCorp International LLC v. AAR Airlift Group, Inc.

MEMORANDUM in opposition re Motion to dismiss

25 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 266,796 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint

  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 279,848 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing

  3. Ancata v. Prison Health Services, Inc.

    769 F.2d 700 (11th Cir. 1985)   Cited 1,009 times
    Holding that medical providers' delay in in providing necessary medical treatment to a prisoner who was later diagnosed and died from leukemia constituted deliberate indifference

  4. Palm Beach Golf Center-Boca, Inc. v. Sarris

    781 F.3d 1245 (11th Cir. 2015)   Cited 230 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding federal pleading rules do not "require that a theory of vicarious liability be specifically pled in the complaint"

  5. Wallis v. Justice Oaks II, Ltd.

    898 F.2d 1544 (11th Cir. 1990)   Cited 445 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the authorization of a settlement is not a final decision on the merits

  6. Furmanite America, Inc. v. T.D. Williamson, Inc.

    506 F. Supp. 2d 1134 (M.D. Fla. 2007)   Cited 75 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding defendant's alleged misappropriation of plaintiff's confidential information and trade secrets would constitute unlawful and unfair acts under the FDUTPA

  7. Treco International S.A. v. Kromka

    706 F. Supp. 2d 1283 (S.D. Fla. 2010)   Cited 44 times
    Dismissing claim for tortious interference with business relationship

  8. Campanella v. Cnty. of Monroe

    853 F. Supp. 2d 364 (W.D.N.Y. 2012)   Cited 34 times
    Holding that defendants who worked together "clearly shared a common interest in the subject matter of [one of the defendant's] statements about [one of the plaintiffs]"

  9. Eastman Chem. Co. v. Alphapet Inc.

    Civ. Action No. 09-971-LPS-CJB (D. Del. Nov. 4, 2011)   Cited 31 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the mere possibility of a benefit by virtue of parenthood does not address the necessary question of whether the parties intended to confer some benefit to the parent company

  10. Seymour v. Adams

    638 So. 2d 1044 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 53 times
    Listing the elements of the tort of conversion

  11. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 163,896 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."

  12. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 40,128 times   335 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that fraud be pleaded with particularity

  13. Section 688.002 - Definitions

    Fla. Stat. § 688.002   Cited 204 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Describing the meaning of trade secret