9 Cited authorities

  1. Roby v. Corp. of Lloyd's

    996 F.2d 1353 (2d Cir. 1993)   Cited 475 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding a court should consider whether a "clause[] contravene a strong public policy of the forum state" in determining if it is unreasonable
  2. NML Capital, Ltd. v. Republic of Argentina

    727 F.3d 230 (2d Cir. 2013)   Cited 40 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a non-party may appeal an injunction by which it is bound
  3. Swezey v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 5093 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 38 times

    2012-06-26 Osqugama F. SWEZEY, Appellant, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INCORPORATED, Respondent, and Philippine National Bank et al., Intervenors–Respondents. Kohn, Swift & Graf, P.C. (Robert A. Swift, of the Philadelphia bar, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), and Anderson Kill & Olick, P.C., New York City (Jeffrey E. Glen of counsel), for appellant. Sidley Austin LLP, New York City (Daniel A. McLaughlin, A. Robert Pietrzak and Cameron Moxley of counsel), for respondent. GRAFFEO Kohn

  4. NML Capital, Ltd. v. Republic of Argentina

    699 F.3d 246 (2d Cir. 2012)   Cited 36 times
    Finding that in light of debtor's “disregard of its legal obligations” to creditors, public interest favored permanent injunction requiring specific performance of those obligations
  5. Swezey v. Merrill Lynch

    87 A.D.3d 119 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 23 times

    No. 2708. June 16, 2011. APPEAL from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered November 16, 2009. The judgment, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied a motion by the intervenors to dismiss the petition pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) and (10). Swezey v Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith, Inc., 2009 NY Slip Op 32650(U), reversed. Mayer Brown LLP, New York City ( Michael O. Ware and Andrew J. Calica of counsel) and Mayer Brown LLP, Washington

  6. Indosuez Intl. Fin. v. Nat. Reserve Bank

    304 A.D.2d 429 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)   Cited 29 times
    Holding that "damages may be obtained for breach of a forum selection clause"
  7. NML Capital, Ltd. v. Republic of Argentina

    08 Civ. 6978 (TPG) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 21, 2012)   Cited 8 times   1 Legal Analyses

    08 Civ. 6978 (TPG) 09 Civ. 1707 (TPG) 09 Civ. 1708 (TPG) 11-21-2012 NML CAPITAL, LTD., Plaintiff, v. REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA, Defendants. Thomas P. Griesa OPINION On October 26, 2012, the Court of Appeals handed down an opinion affirming certain injunctions entered by the District Court. These injunctions were designed to remedy Argentina's breach of the Pari Passu Clause, including the "Equal Treatment Provision," contained in the contractual provisions of the Fiscal Agency Agreement Bonds ("FAA Bonds")

  8. Hanrahan v. Probation Dept

    119 A.D.2d 334 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)   Cited 3 times
    Denying a 5225(b) petition where the judgment debtor retained no interest in the funds being sought by the judgment creditor
  9. Section 5225 - Payment or delivery of property of judgment debtor

    N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 5225   Cited 861 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing judgment creditor to commence special proceeding against garnishee who holds assets of judgment debtor