60 Cited authorities

  1. University of Texas v. Camenisch

    451 U.S. 390 (1981)   Cited 3,083 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the question whether a preliminary injunction should have been issued . . . is moot . . . [where] the terms of the injunction . . . have been fully and irrevocably carried out."
  2. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.

    20 Cal.4th 163 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 2,421 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that for an act to be "unfair," it must "threaten" a violation of law or "violate the policy or spirit of one of those laws because its effects are comparable to or the same as a violation of the law"
  3. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

    29 Cal.4th 1134 (Cal. 2003)   Cited 1,655 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff cannot recover damages under Cal. Bus. Prof. Code § 17200 unless plaintiff has "an ownership interest in the money it seeks to recover"
  4. In re Tobacco II Cases

    46 Cal.4th 298 (Cal. 2009)   Cited 1,203 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Holding class representatives had standing to challenge common marketing of cigarettes despite differences in the advertisements or statements on which class members relied
  5. Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.

    290 F. Supp. 2d 1101 (C.D. Cal. 2003)   Cited 690 times
    Holding that plaintiffs could prevail if they could prove at trial that certain transfers made pursuant to a Ponzi scheme were made within the limitations period of California's UFTA
  6. Lozano v. Wireless Servs.

    504 F.3d 718 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 589 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the law on predominance requires the district court to consider variations in state law when a class action involves multiple jurisdictions"
  7. In re Jesusa V

    32 Cal.4th 588 (Cal. 2004)   Cited 469 times
    Holding that Cal. Fam. Code § 7540's conclusive presumption "is not really a presumption at all but instead is a rule of substantive law," as contrasted with Cal. Fam. Code § 7611's rebuttable presumptions
  8. Jorgensen v. Cassiday

    320 F.3d 906 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 450 times
    Affirming a decision to strike answers as a sanction for the failure to produce requested documents, and rejecting defendant's explanation that the documents "were in the possession of a Philippines guardianship court and could not be released without its approval" because defendants had not shown any attempt to obtain the documents from that court or that production would be impossible
  9. In re First Alliance Mortg. Co.

    471 F.3d 977 (9th Cir. 2006)   Cited 386 times
    Holding that California law requires clear and convincing evidence of fraud, oppression, or malice
  10. Casey v. United States Bank Nat. Assn.

    127 Cal.App.4th 1138 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 310 times
    Holding that the complaint "must allege the defendant's actual knowledge" of the specific act of fraud to adequately plead aiding and abetting fraud
  11. Rule 65 - Injunctions and Restraining Orders

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 65   Cited 22,421 times   87 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing court's ability to enter emergency order with less than full adversary hearing and even, in appropriate circumstances, without notice
  12. Section 17200 - Unfair competition defined

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200   Cited 17,839 times   315 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting unlawful business practices
  13. Section 17203 - Injunctive relief

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17203   Cited 984 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that an individual plead that she lost "money or property" because of the alleged deceptive conduct
  14. Section 2224 - Involuntary trustee of thing gained by fraud, accident, mistake or undue influence

    Cal. Civ. Code § 2224   Cited 418 times
    Naming person who "gains a thing by fraud, accident, mistake, undue influence, the violation of a trust, or other wrongful act" as an "involuntary trustee of the thing gained"
  15. Section 1901 - Certificate evidencing election to wind up and dissolve

    Cal. Corp. Code § 1901   Cited 8 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (a) Whenever a corporation has elected to wind up and dissolve a certificate evidencing such election shall forthwith be filed. (b) The certificate shall be an officers' certificate or shall be signed and verified by at least a majority of the directors then in office or by one or more shareholders authorized to do so by shareholders holding shares representing 50 percent or more of the voting power and shall set forth: (1) That the corporation has elected to wind up and dissolve. (2) If the election

  16. Section 1701 - Generally

    Cal. Lab. Code § 1701   Cited 5 times

    For purposes of this chapter, the following terms have the following meanings: (a) "Artist" means a person who is or seeks to become an actor, actress, model, extra, radio artist, musical artist, musical organization, director, musical director, writer, cinematographer, composer, lyricist, arranger, or other person rendering professional services in motion picture, theatrical, radio, television, Internet, print media, or other entertainment enterprises or technologies. (b) "Audition" means any activity