27 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 260,142 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 273,590 times   368 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  3. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Morgan

    536 U.S. 101 (2002)   Cited 10,460 times   31 Legal Analyses
    Holding limitations period for hostile-work-environment claim runs from the last act composing the claim
  4. Clark Cty. Sch. Dist. v. Breeden

    532 U.S. 268 (2001)   Cited 5,470 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the temporal proximity requirement to establish a prima facie case "between an employer's knowledge of protected activity and an adverse employment action as sufficient evidence" must be "very close"
  5. Fowler v. UPMC Shadyside

    578 F.3d 203 (3d Cir. 2009)   Cited 14,340 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion "in denying a motion for a class action determination which was untimely under the local rule"
  6. Santiago v. Warminster Township

    629 F.3d 121 (3d Cir. 2010)   Cited 4,324 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court should disregard "'naked assertions devoid of further factual enhancement' and 'threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements.'" (quoting Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678)
  7. Moore v. City of Philadelphia

    461 F.3d 331 (3d Cir. 2006)   Cited 1,534 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs statement, complaining about fellow employee's specific comments and made to that employee's supervisor in front of that employee, constitutes protected conduct
  8. Jean v. Deflaminis

    480 F.3d 259 (3d Cir. 2007)   Cited 1,259 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff may establish the requisite causal link by proving "either an unusually suggestive temporal proximity between the protected activity and the allegedly retaliatory action, or a pattern of antagonism coupled with timing to establish a causal link"
  9. Sarullo v. U.S. Postal Service

    352 F.3d 789 (3d Cir. 2003)   Cited 1,219 times
    Holding that plaintiff failed to make a prima facie showing of discrimination when employee "provided no evidence to rebut [employer's] declaration that he was unaware of [the protected activity] when he made his decision," to terminate employee
  10. Abramson v. William Paterson Coll. of N.J

    260 F.3d 265 (3d Cir. 2001)   Cited 1,196 times
    Holding that plaintiff produced sufficient evidence to preclude summary judgment where her supervisors' continued discriminatory comments demonstrated ongoing antagonism
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 354,229 times   943 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 4 - Summons

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 4   Cited 71,368 times   127 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time
  13. Section 1746 - Unsworn declarations under penalty of perjury

    28 U.S.C. § 1746   Cited 10,247 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Making affidavits and declarations effectively synonymous
  14. Rule 424 - Corporations and Similar Entities

    231 Pa. Code § 424   Cited 110 times
    Using language similar to that in Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h)(B)