22 Cited authorities

Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Envtl. Servs. (TOC), Inc.
528 U.S. 167 (2000) Cited 7,152 times 25 Legal Analyses
Holding that plaintiffs who curtailed their recreational activities on a river due to reasonable concerns about the effect of pollutant discharges into that river had standing
Medimmune, Inc. v. GenenTech, Inc.
549 U.S. 118 (2007) Cited 2,535 times 90 Legal Analyses
Holding "the phrase 'case of actual controversy' in the Act refers to the types of 'Cases' and 'Controversies' that are justiciable under Article III"
Moss v. U.S. Secret Service
572 F.3d 962 (9th Cir. 2009) Cited 8,722 times
Holding that the court lacked jurisdiction over the district court's deferral of the summary judgment motion
Roe v. Wade
410 U.S. 113 (1973) Cited 4,089 times 26 Legal Analyses
Holding that end of pregnancy did not moot the case because the plaintiff was capable of becoming pregnant again
Church of Scientology of California v. United States
506 U.S. 9 (1992) Cited 1,591 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that an appeal concerning produced tape recordings was not moot because a court could "effectuate a partial remedy by ordering the [receiving party] to destroy" copies of the recordings
Murphy v. Hunt
455 U.S. 478 (1982) Cited 2,039 times
Holding that defendant's claim to pretrial bail became moot once he was convicted
Havens Realty Corp. v. Coleman
455 U.S. 363 (1982) Cited 2,028 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding that an allegation in the complaint that the plaintiff organization "has had to devote significant resources to identify and counteract the defendant's" illegal practices was sufficient to confer standing to the organization in its own right at the pleading stage
United States Parole Comm'n v. Geraghty
445 U.S. 388 (1980) Cited 2,013 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding even a named plaintiff whose individual claims are moot retains a "personal stake" in representing the class jurisdictionally sufficient to appeal the denial of class certification
Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkle
416 U.S. 115 (1974) Cited 448 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that employers had standing to challenge, under the Labor Management Relations Act, New Jersey regulations that granted benefits to their striking employees
Moore v. Ogilvie
394 U.S. 814 (1969) Cited 516 times
Holding that the use of nomination petitions by independent candidates is a procedure that "must pass muster against the charges of discrimination or of abridgment of the right to vote"

Does 1-3 v. US Attorney - D-NV

22 Cited authorities

Holding that plaintiffs who curtailed their recreational activities on a river due to reasonable concerns about the effect of pollutant discharges into that river had standing

Holding "the phrase 'case of actual controversy' in the Act refers to the types of 'Cases' and 'Controversies' that are justiciable under Article III"

Holding that the court lacked jurisdiction over the district court's deferral of the summary judgment motion

Holding that end of pregnancy did not moot the case because the plaintiff was capable of becoming pregnant again

Holding that an appeal concerning produced tape recordings was not moot because a court could "effectuate a partial remedy by ordering the [receiving party] to destroy" copies of the recordings

Holding that defendant's claim to pretrial bail became moot once he was convicted

Holding that an allegation in the complaint that the plaintiff organization "has had to devote significant resources to identify and counteract the defendant's" illegal practices was sufficient to confer standing to the organization in its own right at the pleading stage

Holding even a named plaintiff whose individual claims are moot retains a "personal stake" in representing the class jurisdictionally sufficient to appeal the denial of class certification

Holding that employers had standing to challenge, under the Labor Management Relations Act, New Jersey regulations that granted benefits to their striking employees

Holding that the use of nomination petitions by independent candidates is a procedure that "must pass muster against the charges of discrimination or of abridgment of the right to vote"