12 Cited authorities

Doe v. United States Dept. of Justice
753 F.2d 1092 (D.C. Cir. 1985) Cited 421 times
Holding that claim should not be dismissed if some type of relief, not limited to relief asked for in the complaint, can be awarded
U.S. v. Ferrara
54 F.3d 825 (D.C. Cir. 1995) Cited 200 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding that a state official sued in her official capacity should be treated as a state, which was found not to be a "person" under a similarly worded long-arm statute
Doe v. U.S.
821 F.2d 694 (D.C. Cir. 1987) Cited 101 times
Finding that in this context, de novo means “a fresh, independent determination of ‘the matter’ at stake,” and the court need not give “deference ... [to] the agency's conclusion”
Women Prisoners v. District of Columbia
877 F. Supp. 634 (D.D.C. 1994) Cited 78 times
Holding that shackling a woman "in labor and shortly thereafter ... is inhumane"
Doe v. DiGenova
779 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1985) Cited 33 times
Noting "rigorous requirements that Congress chose to impose on the disclosure process by means of the Privacy Act"
Doe # 1 v. Williams
167 F. Supp. 2d 45 (D.D.C. 2001) Cited 7 times
Making similar observations about, inter alia, Cutshall and Russell
U.S. v. Ferrara
847 F. Supp. 964 (D.D.C. 1993) Cited 11 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that impact in the District resulting from the defendant's conduct that occurred outside the District must be deliberate, not incidental
Doe v. Bd. on Prof. Resp. of D.C. Court
717 F.2d 1424 (D.C. Cir. 1983) Cited 20 times
Holding that the RFPA did not apply to the D.C. Court of Appeals
Doe v. U.S. Dept. of Justice
790 F. Supp. 17 (D.D.C. 1992) Cited 11 times
Finding that an agency must protect "even the most oblique indications of identity."
Doe v. U.S. Air Force
812 F.2d 738 (D.C. Cir. 1987) Cited 15 times
Holding that declaratory judgement would constitute relief where the government would respond to the declaration by returning seized materials
Section 552a - Records maintained on individuals
5 U.S.C. § 552a Cited 4,429 times 47 Legal Analyses
Finding that it is a Department of Justice component that has as its principal function the enforcement of criminal laws includ[ing] correctional authorities

Doe v. U.S. Department of Treasury et al

12 Cited authorities

Holding that claim should not be dismissed if some type of relief, not limited to relief asked for in the complaint, can be awarded

Finding that a state official sued in her official capacity should be treated as a state, which was found not to be a "person" under a similarly worded long-arm statute

Finding that in this context, de novo means “a fresh, independent determination of ‘the matter’ at stake,” and the court need not give “deference ... [to] the agency's conclusion”

Holding that shackling a woman "in labor and shortly thereafter ... is inhumane"

Noting "rigorous requirements that Congress chose to impose on the disclosure process by means of the Privacy Act"

Making similar observations about, inter alia, Cutshall and Russell

Holding that impact in the District resulting from the defendant's conduct that occurred outside the District must be deliberate, not incidental

Holding that the RFPA did not apply to the D.C. Court of Appeals

Finding that an agency must protect "even the most oblique indications of identity."

Holding that declaratory judgement would constitute relief where the government would respond to the declaration by returning seized materials

Finding that it is a Department of Justice component that has as its principal function the enforcement of criminal laws includ[ing] correctional authorities