53 Cited authorities

  1. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

    504 U.S. 555 (1992)   Cited 28,570 times   141 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"
  2. List v. Driehaus

    573 U.S. 149 (2014)   Cited 2,080 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state government's credible threat of prosecting the plaintiffs under a statute criminalizing false statements about candidates during a political campaign established standing in a facial pre-enforcement challenge
  3. Davis v. Monroe County Bd. of Educ.

    526 U.S. 629 (1999)   Cited 2,006 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the plaintiff sufficiently alleged actionable sexual harassment where her minor daughter suffered "objectively offensive touching" that amounted to "criminal sexual misconduct"
  4. Wash. State Grange v. Wa. State Repub. Party

    552 U.S. 442 (2008)   Cited 1,300 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts should neither "anticipate a question of constitutional law in advance of the necessity of deciding it" nor "formulate a rule of constitutional law broader than is required by the precise facts to which it is to be applied"
  5. Chavez v. Martinez

    538 U.S. 760 (2003)   Cited 1,272 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a failure to read Miranda warnings did not violate the respondent's constitutional rights
  6. U.S. v. Morrison

    529 U.S. 598 (2000)   Cited 1,285 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Congress exceeded its interstate commerce powers in enacting a civil remedy for victims of gender-motivated violence
  7. Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner

    387 U.S. 136 (1967)   Cited 5,338 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs subject to a regulation had standing to challenge it even though the Attorney General had yet to "authorize criminal and seizure actions for violations of the statute"
  8. Heckler v. Chaney

    470 U.S. 821 (1985)   Cited 2,074 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statute did not provide meaningful standards because it did not "speak to the criteria which shall be used by the agency for investigating possible violations of the [statute]"
  9. Cannon v. University of Chicago

    441 U.S. 677 (1979)   Cited 2,384 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 created a private right of action for victims of education discrimination
  10. Heckler v. Ringer

    466 U.S. 602 (1984)   Cited 1,776 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs' claims were not wholly collateral to a statutory scheme of administrative and judicial review of Medicare payment decisions, where plaintiffs' constitutional and statutory challenge to an agency's procedure for reaching payment decisions was "at bottom" an attempt to reverse the agency's decision to deny payment
  11. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 160,289 times   196 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  12. Section 8 - Powers of Congress

    U.S. Const. art. I, § 8   Cited 7,046 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Granting Congress the power to “provide for the common Defence,” to “regulate Commerce with foreign Nations,” and to “establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization”
  13. Section 1092 - Institutional and financial assistance information for students

    20 U.S.C. § 1092   Cited 109 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Requiring funding recipients to collect statistics on crimes motivated by the victim's "gender, ... sexual orientation"
  14. Section 100.7 - Conduct of investigations

    34 C.F.R. § 100.7   Cited 192 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing simply for the filing of a written complaint within 180 days of alleged discrimination
  15. Section 80.7 - Conduct of investigations

    45 C.F.R. § 80.7   Cited 49 times

    (a)Periodic compliance reviews. The responsible Department official or his designee shall from time to time review the practices of recipients to determine whether they are complying with this part. (b)Complaints. Any person who believes himself or any specific class of individuals to be subjected to discrimination prohibited by this part may by himself or by a representative file with the responsible Department official or his designee a written complaint. A complaint must be filed not later than