§Why CasetextPricing

Doe (1) et al v. Backpage.com, LLC et al

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nemet Chevrolet v. Consumeraffairs.com, Inc.

    591 F.3d 250 (4th Cir. 2009)   Cited 3,300 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a website did not contribute to alleged illegality

  2. Doe v. Myspace

    528 F.3d 413 (5th Cir. 2008)   Cited 827 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that CDA bars claims for negligence and gross negligence in not preventing a 13 year old girl from lying about her age to create a personal profile that led to contact by a sexual predator

  3. Batzel v. Smith

    333 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 369 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the denial of an anti-SLAPP motion is appealable under § 1291

  4. Ben Ezra, Weinstein, & Co. v. America Online Inc.

    206 F.3d 980 (10th Cir. 2000)   Cited 281 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendant was immune to the defamation claim when it made its own editorial decisions with respect to third-party information published on its website

  5. Universal v. Lycos

    478 F.3d 413 (1st Cir. 2007)   Cited 165 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that website operator did not become information content provider “merely because the ‘construct and operation’ of the web site might have some influence on the content of the postings” or because website simply “provided ‘culpable assistance’ to subscribers wishing to disseminate misinformation”

  6. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 366,273 times   968 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

  7. Section 230 - Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material

    47 U.S.C. § 230   Cited 1,104 times   170 Legal Analyses
    In Section 230, Congress provided interactive computer services broad immunity from lawsuits seeking to hold those companies liable for publishing information provided by third parties.