45 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 255,203 times   280 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 268,949 times   367 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
  3. American Dental Assoc. v. Cigna Corp.

    605 F.3d 1283 (11th Cir. 2010)   Cited 1,584 times
    Holding that the district court properly dismissed plaintiffs' § 1962(c) claims because plaintiffs had not sufficiently pled the acts of mail and wire fraud alleged to form a pattern of racketeering activity
  4. Brown Shoe Co. v. United States

    370 U.S. 294 (1962)   Cited 1,825 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding judgment final and appealable where district court passed on every prayer for relief in the complaint and ordered full divestiture of stock, although court had not yet approved a divestiture plan
  5. Jefferson Parish Hospital Dist. No. 2 v. Hyde

    466 U.S. 2 (1984)   Cited 805 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "any inquiry into the validity of a tying arrangement must focus on the market or markets in which the two products are sold, for that is where the anticompetitive forcing has its impact"
  6. United States v. du Pont Co.

    351 U.S. 377 (1956)   Cited 1,240 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding relevant market is defined by "commodities reasonably interchangeable by consumers for the same purposes" as subject product; finding, where product was cellophane, relevant product market was "flexible packaging material market"
  7. Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc.

    547 U.S. 28 (2006)   Cited 233 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that separate markets existed for software and hardware even when they were always bundled together
  8. Lafayette v. Louisiana Power Light Co.

    435 U.S. 389 (1978)   Cited 507 times
    Holding that States and municipalities are “persons” under federal antitrust law
  9. Town of Hallie v. City of Eau Claire

    471 U.S. 34 (1985)   Cited 386 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that municipal entities, though not sovereign, may avail themselves of the immunity if their actions spring from governing state authority
  10. Parker v. Brown

    317 U.S. 341 (1943)   Cited 1,311 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Holding that restraints imposed by the state "as an act of government" are immune from antitrust liability
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 348,503 times   930 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 157,606 times   196 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  13. Section 13-8-2 - Contracts contravening public policy generally

    Ga. Code § 13-8-2   Cited 191 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting "contracts in general restraint of trade"
  14. Section 36-34-5 - Acquisition and construction of water and sewage systems

    Ga. Code § 36-34-5   Cited 10 times
    Authorizing municipalities "[t]o operate and maintain any such [water] systems"
  15. Section 36-65-1 - Statement of policy

    Ga. Code § 36-65-1   Cited 8 times

    It is declared by the General Assembly of Georgia that in the exercise of powers specifically granted to them by law, local governing authorities of cities and counties are acting pursuant to state policy. OCGA § 36-65-1

  16. Section 36-65-2 - Immunity of local governments from antitrust liability

    Ga. Code § 36-65-2   Cited 3 times

    This chapter is intended to articulate clearly and express affirmatively the policy of the State of Georgia that in the exercise of such powers, such local governing authorities shall be immune from antitrust liability to the same degree and extent as enjoyed by the State of Georgia. OCGA § 36-65-2