508 F.3d 106 (2d Cir. 2007) Cited 1,630 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding plaintiff adequately pleaded Title VII retaliation because she "allege[d] that she specifically overheard [defendant's employees] conspiring to drive her out of her job and that [one employee] issued a negative performance review that specifically complain[ed] about her attitude towards [him]," and therefore her allegation of causal connection was "not based only—or even primarily—on temporal proximity"