§Why CasetextPricing

DHIAB et al v. BUSH et al

REPLY to opposition to motion re Respondents' Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Related Appeals And for Continued Coordination

5 Cited authorities

  1. Mazurek v. Armstrong

    520 U.S. 968 (1997)   Cited 3,350 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief has a "requirement for substantial proof is much higher" than a defendant's summary judgment motion

  2. Al-Fayed v. C.I.A

    254 F.3d 300 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 113 times
    Holding that judicial review of agency's denial of expedited processing request is appropriate where plaintiff did not appeal the decision to the agency

  3. Al-Anazi v. Bush

    370 F. Supp. 2d 188 (D.D.C. 2005)   Cited 25 times
    Asserting that the petitioners failed to reconcile how the explicit language of § 2242(d) of the FARR Act provides for binding rights outside the context of a final order of removal

  4. Al-Joudi v. Bush

    Civil Action No. 05-301 (GK) (D.D.C. Apr. 4, 2005)   Cited 2 times

    Civil Action No. 05-301 (GK). April 4, 2005 MEMORANDUM OPINION GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge Petitioners, four Saudi Arabian nationals, bring this action against Defendants, seeking release from the Guantanamo Bay Naval Station ("GTMO") in Cuba, where they are being detained. This matter is before the Court on Petitioners' Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction Requiring Respondents to Provide Counsel for Petitioners and the Court with 30-Days' Advance Notice of Any

  5. In re Guantanamo Detainee Cases

    Civil Action No. 02-CV-0299 (CKK), No. 04-CV-1135 (ESH), 04-CV-1136 (JDB), 04-CV-1227 (RBW), 04-CV-1144 (RWR), 04-CV-1164 (RBW), 04-CV-1194 (HHK) (D.D.C. Feb. 8, 2005)

    Civil Action No. 02-CV-0299 (CKK), No. 04-CV-1135 (ESH), 04-CV-1136 (JDB), 04-CV-1227 (RBW), 04-CV-1144 (RWR), 04-CV-1164 (RBW), 04-CV-1194 (HHK). February 8, 2005 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER GRANTING STAY PENDING APPEAL JOYCE GREEN, Senior District Judge Upon consideration of the Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Stay Pending Appeal filed by the petitioners in the above-captioned cases, in light of the substantial resources that would be expended and the significant