13 Cited authorities

  1. ARCO Envtl. Remediation, L.L.C. v. Dept. of Health and Envtl. Quality

    213 F.3d 1108 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 3,305 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that injunctive relief ordering the release of documentation to the public about a contaminated site does not challenge a pending cleanup effort because access to information "does not alter cleanup requirements or environmental standards" and does not "terminate or delay the ... cleanup"
  2. University of S. Alabama v. American Tobacco

    168 F.3d 405 (11th Cir. 1999)   Cited 2,782 times
    Holding that if a party is deemed to be “an arm or alter ego of the State, ” then diversity jurisdiction “must fail”
  3. Avitts v. Amoco Production Co.

    53 F.3d 690 (5th Cir. 1995)   Cited 237 times
    Holding that district court was "without authority to enter its orders" in improvidently removed case, and vacating all district court orders and directing district court to remand case to state court
  4. In re Zyprexa Prod. Liability Litig

    594 F.3d 113 (2d Cir. 2010)   Cited 61 times
    Finding that the "most equitable" source of compensation in an MDL is the "recoveries" of benefitting plaintiffs
  5. U.S. v. Kerr-McGee

    540 F.3d 1180 (10th Cir. 2008)   Cited 18 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding communication between federal and state officials in an active investigation under a duty of confidentiality with respect to that information is not a public disclosure insofar as the information is not released into the public domain
  6. Wilderness Society v. Wisely

    524 F. Supp. 2d 1285 (D. Colo. 2007)   Cited 12 times
    Holding that documents which were "considered" are "not simply those that the agency relied upon in reaching its decision"
  7. Jakubik v. Schmirer

    13 Civ. 4087 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 9, 2013)   Cited 4 times

    13 Civ. 4087 (PAE) 07-09-2013 GYULA JANOS JAKUBIK, Petitioner, v. EVA SCHMIRER, Respondent. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge; Before the Court is D.T.J.'s motion to intervene through her next friend, Fr. Christian Gobel, in this case, in which her father, Gyula Janos Jacubik, has petitioned for her return to Hungary under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction ("Hague Convention" or "Convention") and the International Child

  8. Zavadzan v. City of New York

    CV-07-1047 (ARR) (VVP) (E.D.N.Y. May. 14, 2008)   Cited 1 times
    In Zavadzan, the Eastern District of New York considered unspecified federal claims that were the subject of a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to the plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies before filing the lawsuit.
  9. Guetzko v. Keybank National Association

    No. C08-2067 (N.D. Iowa Dec. 4, 2008)

    No. C08-2067. December 4, 2008 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO INTERVENE JON SCOLES, Magistrate Judge This matter comes before the Court on the Motion to Intervene (docket number 3) filed by Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon ("TriMet") on November 14, 2008, and the Resistance (docket number 12) filed by the Plaintiffs on November 26, 2008. According to the motion, Defendant KeyBank National Association ("KeyBank") does not resist the motion to intervene. Pursuant to Local Rule 7

  10. U.S. ex Rel. Maxwell v. Kerr-McGee Oil Gas Corp.

    486 F. Supp. 2d 1233 (D. Colo. 2007)

    Civil Action No. 04-cv-01224-PSF-CBS. May 2, 2007 Michael S. Porter, Atty. at Law, Wheat Ridge, CO, Richard C. Lafond, Lafond Sweeney, LLC, Denver, CO, for Plaintiffs. Gregory E. Goldberg, Scott S. Barker, Danielle Renee Voorhees, Holland Hart, LLP, Denver, CO, Charles D. Tetrault, Vinson Elkins, LLP, Washington, DC, Marie R. Yeates, Vinson Elkins, LLP, Houston, TX, Spikes Kangerga, Vinson Elkins, LLP, Austin, TX, for Defendant. ORDER ON MOTION TO STAY AND MOTION TO ENTER JUDGMENT FIGA, District

  11. Section 157 - Procedures

    28 U.S.C. § 157   Cited 52,153 times   82 Legal Analyses
    Determining the validity, extent, or priority of liens
  12. Section 1334 - Bankruptcy cases and proceedings

    28 U.S.C. § 1334   Cited 41,441 times   58 Legal Analyses
    Granting "exclusive jurisdiction" to a federal court handling a bankruptcy case "of all the property, wherever located, of the debtor as of the commencement of such case, and of property of the estate"
  13. Section 1012 - Intervention as of right; notice to attorney-general, city, county, town or village where constitutionality in issue

    N.Y. CPLR 1012   Cited 994 times

    (a) Intervention as of right. Upon timely motion, any person shall be permitted to intervene in any action: 1. when a statute of the state confers an absolute right to intervene; or 2. when the representation of the person's interest by the parties is or may be inadequate and the person is or may be bound by the judgment; or 3. when the action involves the disposition or distribution of, or the title or a claim for damages for injury to, property and the person may be affected adversely by the judgment