13 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 266,796 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 279,848 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  3. Phillips v. County of Allegheny

    515 F.3d 224 (3d Cir. 2008)   Cited 17,469 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a district court need not permit a curative amendment if such amendment would be futile
  4. Fowler v. UPMC Shadyside

    578 F.3d 203 (3d Cir. 2009)   Cited 14,532 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion "in denying a motion for a class action determination which was untimely under the local rule"
  5. Santiago v. Warminster Township

    629 F.3d 121 (3d Cir. 2010)   Cited 4,400 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court should disregard "'naked assertions devoid of further factual enhancement' and 'threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements.'" (quoting Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678)
  6. Burtch v. Milberg Factors, Inc.

    662 F.3d 212 (3d Cir. 2011)   Cited 2,304 times
    Holding that direct evidence of a conspiracy was lacking where the complaint's allegations did not "specify a time or place that any actual agreement to fix credit terms occurred, [or] ...indicate that any particular individuals or [organizations] made such an agreement"
  7. Great Western Mining v. Fox Rothschild

    615 F.3d 159 (3d Cir. 2010)   Cited 1,898 times
    Holding that a § 1983 conspiracy claimant must assert facts from which a conspiratorial agreement can be inferred, not conclusory allegations
  8. Binsack v. Lackawanna County Prison

    438 F. App'x 158 (3d Cir. 2011)   Cited 254 times
    Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing complaint for failure to "provide a short and plain statement of each claim against each defendant"
  9. Lawal v. McDonald

    546 F. App'x 107 (3d Cir. 2014)   Cited 96 times
    Finding that the complaint, which relied on the "repeated and collective use of the word 'Defendants,'" was ambiguous about each defendant's role in the events giving rise to plaintiff's claims
  10. Neology, Inc. v. Kapsch Trafficcom Ivhs, Inc.

    Civil Action No. 13-2052-LPS (D. Del. Sep. 19, 2014)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that "[t]hese kinds of allegations, specific to no [d]efendant and generic as to all, are unhelpful in further flushing out a facially plausible claim"
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 361,487 times   960 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 163,896 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."