50 Cited authorities

  1. In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc. Plastic Coolant Tubes Prods. Liab. Litig.

    880 F. Supp. 2d 801 (S.D. Ohio 2012)   Cited 154 times
    Finding the plaintiff plausibly stated a claim for breach of implied warranty in tort where the plaintiff alleged that the defective coolant tubes could cause sudden engine failure while traveling at high speeds
  2. Harris Group v. Robinson

    209 P.3d 1188 (Colo. App. 2009)   Cited 119 times
    Holding that unjust enrichment is an equitable remedy that is not available where there is “a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law”
  3. Orwick v. Seattle

    103 Wn. 2d 249 (Wash. 1984)   Cited 226 times
    Finding that the superior court had jurisdiction to grant equitable relief where the petitioners alleged that there were system-wide violations of mandatory statutory requirements by a municipal court
  4. Weiper v. W.A. Hill Assoc

    104 Ohio App. 3d 250 (Ohio Ct. App. 1995)   Cited 153 times
    Finding that the comment that the plaintiff would be making "a lot of money for the company for a long time to come" was not sufficient to establish a promise of continued employment
  5. McCabe v. American Honda Motor Co.

    100 Cal.App.4th 1111 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 117 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the consumer-expectations test could be used to determine whether an airbag was defectively designed
  6. Paschall's, Inc. v. Dozier

    219 Tenn. 45 (Tenn. 1966)   Cited 316 times
    In Paschall's, however, the court emphasized that recovery was not available in every such situation, as each case had to be decided “according to the essential elements of quasi-contract.” Id.
  7. American Honda Motor v. Motorcycle Info. Network

    390 F. Supp. 2d 1170 (M.D. Fla. 2005)   Cited 98 times
    Holding that a fraud claim was not entirely dependent upon a claim brought pursuant to the Florida Uniform Trade Secrets Act, where the fraud claim also contained unique allegations "that the [counterclaim defendant] intentionally induced the [counterclaim plaintiffs] to abstain from contracting with other business entities with respect to the system"
  8. Ockey v. Lehmer

    2008 UT 37 (Utah 2008)   Cited 77 times
    Holding that a contract arising from fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake is "voidable"
  9. Troup v. Toyota Motor Corp.

    545 F. App'x 668 (9th Cir. 2013)   Cited 63 times
    Holding that a breach of the implied warranty occurs where a defect "drastically undermine the ordinary operation" of the consumer good
  10. David v. American Suzuki Motor Corp.

    629 F. Supp. 2d 1309 (N.D. Fla. 2009)   Cited 60 times
    Dismissing breach of implied warranty claim under Florida law against American Suzuki or Suzuki Japan for lack of contractual privity because plaintiff "purchased his motorcycle from dealer Motorsports in Miami, not from American Suzuki or Suzuki Japan"
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 362,607 times   962 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 164,455 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  13. Section 17200 - Unfair competition defined

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200   Cited 18,446 times   316 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting unlawful business practices
  14. Section 2301 - Definitions

    15 U.S.C. § 2301   Cited 2,588 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Including as consumers those entitled to enforce a warranty "under applicable State law"
  15. Section 1750 - Title of act

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1750   Cited 2,777 times   69 Legal Analyses

    This title may be cited as the Consumers Legal Remedies Act. Ca. Civ. Code § 1750 Added by Stats. 1970, Ch. 1550.

  16. Section 17500 - Untrue or misleading advertising

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17500   Cited 2,768 times   65 Legal Analyses
    Requiring action that originated in California to effect consumers in another state
  17. Section 501.201 - Short title

    Fla. Stat. § 501.201   Cited 1,021 times   9 Legal Analyses

    This part shall be known and may be cited as the "Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act." Fla. Stat. § 501.201 s. 1, ch. 73-124.

  18. Section 1345.01 - Consumer sales practices definitions

    Ohio Rev. Code § 1345.01   Cited 929 times
    Defining "[s]upplier" as a "person engaged in the business of effecting . . . consumer transactions, whether or not the person deals directly with the consumer"
  19. Section 17.41 - Short Title

    Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 17.41   Cited 783 times   2 Legal Analyses

    This subchapter may be cited as the Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act. Tex. Bus. and Comm. Code § 17.41 Added by Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 322, ch. 143, Sec. 1, eff. 5/21/1973.

  20. Section 47-18-101 - Short title

    Tenn. Code § 47-18-101   Cited 593 times   2 Legal Analyses

    This part shall be known and may be cited as the "Tennessee Consumer Protection Act of 1977." T.C.A. § 47-18-101 Acts 1977, ch. 438, § 1.

  21. Section 2-30.001 - Written Statement Explaining Consumer Rights Under Chapter 681, Florida Statutes; Hearings Before Florida New Motor Vehicle Arbitration Board

    Fla. Admin. Code R. 2-30.001   Cited 58 times

    (1) The following documents are incorporated into these rules by reference and can each be obtained by visiting the applicable web address shown below, where available, or by contacting the address shown in subsection (4): (a) The form entitled "Manufacturer's Answer, " DLA/LL-006 (rev. 2/06), effective 2-1-06. (b) The forms entitled "Consumer's Prehearing Information Sheet DLA/LL-007, (rev. 02/2023), effective 2-1-2023, available at http://www.flrules.org/Gateway/reference.asp?No=Ref-14995 and Manufacturer's