20 Cited authorities

AT&T Techs., Inc. v. Commc'ns Workers of Am.
475 U.S. 643 (1986) Cited 5,468 times 24 Legal Analyses
Holding that it was for the court to decide whether a particular labor dispute fell within the arbitration clause of a collective-bargaining agreement
Steelworkers v. Warrior Gulf Co.
363 U.S. 574 (1960) Cited 5,600 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that grievance machinery “is at the very heart of the system of industrial self-government” and the courts should not deny an order to arbitrate “unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute”
Steelworkers v. Enterprise Corp.
363 U.S. 593 (1960) Cited 3,888 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that a reviewing court should not refuse to enforce an arbitral award merely because it would read the collective bargaining agreement differently than the arbitrator
14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett
556 U.S. 247 (2009) Cited 550 times 27 Legal Analyses
Holding that a collective bargaining agreement that "clearly and unmistakably requires union members to arbitrate [Age Discrimination in Employment Act] claims is enforceable as a matter of federal law"
Steelworkers v. Am. Mfg. Co.
363 U.S. 564 (1960) Cited 2,226 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that because the parties bargained for the “arbitrator's judgment,” the underlying “question of contract interpretation” is for the arbitrator, and the courts have “no business weighing the merits of the grievance”
Aluminum Wkrs. Int'l v. Consol. Aluminum Corp.
696 F.2d 437 (6th Cir. 1982) Cited 86 times
Holding that backpay could, and realistically would, be used to repair any damage to credit stature
Lukens Steel v. United Steelworkers of America
989 F.2d 668 (3d Cir. 1993) Cited 54 times
Holding that an arbitration provision was broad where it called for arbitration "[s]hould any differences arise as to the meaning and application of, or compliance with, the provisions of this Agreement" and further noting that the parties' express exclusion of other categories of subject matter from the arbitration clause indicated that the parties knew how to limit the categories of arbitrable subject matter
Camping Const. Co. v. District Council
915 F.2d 1333 (9th Cir. 1990) Cited 55 times
Holding that the district court “itself ruled on the arbitrability question, and concluded that both the termination issue and the repudiation issue were arbitrable.”
ATT BROADBAND v. INTERN. BROTH. OF ELEC
317 F.3d 758 (7th Cir. 2003) Cited 32 times
Holding that the Norris-LaGuardia Act precludes injunctive relief against arbitration of a labor dispute, and expressly holding that conduct of the arbitration proceedings does not constitute irreparable injury
Air Line Pilots v. Guilford Transp. Industries
399 F.3d 89 (1st Cir. 2005) Cited 26 times
Holding that cases involving "violations of a CBA or even the repudiation thereof . . . ordinarily will not come within the ambit" of Section 2, Third and Fourth
Section 1 - "Maritime transactions" and "commerce" defined; exceptions to operation of title
9 U.S.C. § 1 Cited 12,156 times 211 Legal Analyses
Defining the word "commerce" in the language of the Commerce Clause itself
Rule 3 - Commencing an Action
Fed. R. Civ. P. 3 Cited 3,063 times 5 Legal Analyses
Stating that once the inmate has filed his motion with the clerk, "[t]he clerk must file the motion and enter it on the criminal docket of the case in which the challenged judgment was entered"
Section 107 - Issuance of injunctions in labor disputes; hearing; findings of court; notice to affected persons; temporary restraining order; undertakings
29 U.S.C. § 107 Cited 340 times 1 Legal Analyses
Requiring hearing prior to issuance of an injunction in labor disputes

de Souza Silva v. Pioneer Janitorial Services, Inc.

20 Cited authorities

Holding that it was for the court to decide whether a particular labor dispute fell within the arbitration clause of a collective-bargaining agreement

Holding that a reviewing court should not refuse to enforce an arbitral award merely because it would read the collective bargaining agreement differently than the arbitrator

Holding that a collective bargaining agreement that "clearly and unmistakably requires union members to arbitrate [Age Discrimination in Employment Act] claims is enforceable as a matter of federal law"

Holding that because the parties bargained for the “arbitrator's judgment,” the underlying “question of contract interpretation” is for the arbitrator, and the courts have “no business weighing the merits of the grievance”

Holding that backpay could, and realistically would, be used to repair any damage to credit stature

Holding that the district court “itself ruled on the arbitrability question, and concluded that both the termination issue and the repudiation issue were arbitrable.”

Holding that the Norris-LaGuardia Act precludes injunctive relief against arbitration of a labor dispute, and expressly holding that conduct of the arbitration proceedings does not constitute irreparable injury

Holding that cases involving "violations of a CBA or even the repudiation thereof . . . ordinarily will not come within the ambit" of Section 2, Third and Fourth

Defining the word "commerce" in the language of the Commerce Clause itself

Stating that once the inmate has filed his motion with the clerk, "[t]he clerk must file the motion and enter it on the criminal docket of the case in which the challenged judgment was entered"

Requiring hearing prior to issuance of an injunction in labor disputes