12 Cited authorities

Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. Feeney
442 U.S. 256 (1979) Cited 2,062 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Equal Protection Clause is implicated only when "a state legislatur[e] selected or reaffirmed a particular course of action at least in part `because of,' not merely `in spite of,' its adverse effects upon an identifiable group"
Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc.
564 U.S. 552 (2011) Cited 506 times 66 Legal Analyses
Holding that a restriction on "speech result[ing] from an economic motive" is not "a mere commercial regulation"
Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham
394 U.S. 147 (1969) Cited 1,039 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that an ordinance that made it unlawful to organize or hold “any parade or procession or other public demonstration” on city streets without securing a permit from the city commission was a prior restraint
New York Transit Authority v. Beazer
440 U.S. 568 (1979) Cited 479 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that transit authority was justified in refusing to hire methadone users for "safety-sensitive" positions
Peterson v. Martinez
707 F.3d 1197 (10th Cir. 2013) Cited 231 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding the Second Amendment does not guarantee the right to carry a concealed firearm in public
Kachalsky v. Cnty. of Westchester
701 F.3d 81 (2d Cir. 2012) Cited 215 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that although "some form of heightened scrutiny would be appropriate," strict scrutiny was not necessary, and instead applying intermediate scrutiny
Woollard v. Gallagher
712 F.3d 865 (4th Cir. 2013) Cited 125 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that Maryland's "good-and-substantial-reason" requirement for issuing a permit "passes constitutional muster"
Drake v. Filko
724 F.3d 426 (3d Cir. 2013) Cited 121 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding New Jersey's permit requirement was longstanding because its origins dated to 1924
McGuire v. Reilly
386 F.3d 45 (1st Cir. 2004) Cited 71 times
Holding that protester had standing despite lack of prosecution but ultimately concluding that his as-applied challenge failed because he produced "no evidence that the police ... enforced statute in anything other than an evenhanded way"
IMS Health Inc. v. Ayotte
550 F.3d 42 (1st Cir. 2008) Cited 37 times
Upholding a statute regulating the data mining of physician prescription histories as commercial speech

Davis et al v. Grimes et al

12 Cited authorities

Holding that the Equal Protection Clause is implicated only when "a state legislatur[e] selected or reaffirmed a particular course of action at least in part `because of,' not merely `in spite of,' its adverse effects upon an identifiable group"

Holding that a restriction on "speech result[ing] from an economic motive" is not "a mere commercial regulation"

Holding that an ordinance that made it unlawful to organize or hold “any parade or procession or other public demonstration” on city streets without securing a permit from the city commission was a prior restraint

Holding that transit authority was justified in refusing to hire methadone users for "safety-sensitive" positions

Holding the Second Amendment does not guarantee the right to carry a concealed firearm in public

Holding that although "some form of heightened scrutiny would be appropriate," strict scrutiny was not necessary, and instead applying intermediate scrutiny

Holding that Maryland's "good-and-substantial-reason" requirement for issuing a permit "passes constitutional muster"

Holding New Jersey's permit requirement was longstanding because its origins dated to 1924

Holding that protester had standing despite lack of prosecution but ultimately concluding that his as-applied challenge failed because he produced "no evidence that the police ... enforced statute in anything other than an evenhanded way"

Upholding a statute regulating the data mining of physician prescription histories as commercial speech