550 U.S. 544 (2007) Cited 282,303 times 369 Legal Analyses
Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
Holding that a court may "'take judicial notice of matters of public record outside the pleadings' and consider them for purposes of the motion to dismiss."
Holding that a copyright owner and the author were not in privity because the prior contractual relationship did "not satisfy the adequacy-of-representation requirement"
Holding that claim that defendants committed war crimes by assisting Ustasha Regime in preserving its Treasury was non-justiciable because it would require a court to review the foreign policy judgment of a coordinate political branch
Finding genuine issues of material fact existed to support detrimental reliance and claims of actual and constructive fraud where evidence suggested the lender represented to, and advised, the borrower to intentionally miss a monthly payment to invoke the loan modification process, that it had actually approved the borrower for a modification, to make reduced monthly payments, to ignore default notices from the lender, and to ignore the borrower's obligation to cure the default, thereby causing the borrower's default, causing the amount the borrower owed to cure the default to grow, and causing foreclosure to occur
This part shall be cited as the "Montana Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act of 1973". § 30-14-101, MCA En. Sec. 19, Ch. 275, L. 1973; R.C.M. 1947, 85-418.