§Why CasetextPricing

Date v. Sony Electronics, Incorporated et al

REPLY to Response re MOTION Modify the Scheduling Order

2 Cited authorities

  1. Pass & Seymour, Inc. v. Hubbell Inc.

    255 F.R.D. 331 (N.D.N.Y. 2008)   Cited 37 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the producing party must provide some modicum of information about how the documents are kept so that the requesting party may make meaningful use of the documents

  2. Rule 34 - Producing Documents, Electronically Stored Information, and Tangible Things, or Entering onto Land, for Inspection and Other Purposes

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 34   Cited 13,104 times   146 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the rules related to electronic discovery were "not meant to create a routine right of direct access to a party's electronic information system, although such access may be justified in some circumstances."