137 S. Ct. 1773 (2017) Cited 2,283 times 135 Legal Analyses
Holding plaintiffs had failed to establish personal jurisdiction over defendants in California in part because they "did not allege that they obtained [the drug at issue] through California physicians or from any other California source; nor did they claim that they were injured by [that drug] or were treated for their injuries in California"
Holding that the defendant expressly aimed the content of "celebrity-gossip.net" at California because the site had a specific focus on the California-centric entertainment industry
Holding that a district court "need not permit even limited discovery" where a "plaintiff's claim of personal jurisdiction appears to be both attenuated and based on bare allegations in the face of specific denials made by the defendants"
81 F. Supp. 3d 938 (N.D. Cal. 2015) Cited 82 times
Finding three factors—equitable ownership, use of same offices and identical officers and directors—weighed in favor of finding unity of interest but concluding these factors "even when considered together, are not sufficient to support a finding of unity of interest"
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 Cited 74,415 times 131 Legal Analyses
Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time
815 ILCS 505/1 Cited 2,226 times 14 Legal Analyses
Defining "consumer" as "any person who purchases or contracts for the purchase of merchandise not for resale in the ordinary course of his trade or business but for his use or that of a member of his household"