§Why CasetextPricing

Geoffrey Desrosiers,, Respondents,v.Perry Ellis Menswear, LLC, et al., Appellants.

Brief

7 Cited authorities

  1. Shah v. Wilco Systems, Inc.

    27 A.D.3d 169 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)   Cited 107 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting summary judgment on NYCHRL disparate pay claim and holding that "where the claim is based on disparate pay, a plaintiff must first set forth a prima facie case of discrimination, i.e., that he is a member of a protected class and that he was paid less than similarly-situated non-members of the class"

  2. O'Hara v. Del Bello

    47 N.Y.2d 363 (N.Y. 1979)   Cited 85 times
    Requiring the person who commences a class action to move for permission to maintain the action as a class action within 60 days after the time for service of a responsive pleading has expired.

  3. Meraner v. Albany Medical Center

    211 A.D.2d 867 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)   Cited 8 times
    In Meraner, the Court denied class certification where necessary documents were not provided four months before plaintiff moved for class certification.

  4. Matter of Shook v. Lavine

    49 A.D.2d 238 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)   Cited 28 times
    In Matter of Shook v Lavine, (49 A.D.2d 238) and Matter of Wayman v Berger (52 A.D.2d 738) we held that the provisions of section 104-a Soc. Serv. of the Social Services Law and 18 NYCRR 352.23 may not be applied to deny AFDC benefits on the grounds that an applicant had made a transfer of property in order to be eligible for such assistance.

  5. Hernandez v. Gateway Demolition Corp.

    263 A.D.2d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)   Cited 3 times

    Submitted May 28, 1999 July 12, 1999 In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for underpayment of prevailing wages, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), dated April 6, 1998, as granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was to dismiss the class action allegations of the complaint, and denied their cross motion to certify the action as a class action. Hollander Associates, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Larry B. Hollander and Jeffrey

  6. Kensington Gate Owners, Inc. v. Kalikow

    99 A.D.2d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)   Cited 4 times

    January 16, 1984 In an action to recover damages for breach of contract and fraudulent representations, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Morrison, J.), entered December 1, 1982, which denied their motion for class action certification. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. CPLR 902 provides that the plaintiff "shall move for an order" to determine whether an action is to be maintained as a class action, "[w]ithin sixty days after the time to serve a responsive

  7. National Assn. v. No. Hempstead

    102 Misc. 2d 704 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1979)   Cited 7 times

    December 5, 1979 Beth M. Wickey for plaintiffs. Joseph A. Guarino, Town Attorney, for Town of North Hempstead and another, defendants. Stuart L. Ain for North Hempstead Housing Authority, defendant. JAMES F. NIEHOFF, J. This action is brought in the name of the local affiliate of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and nine individuals, eight of whom are residents of the Town of North Hempstead, the ninth being a resident of the Town of Hempstead who is employed in the