§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of FMC Corporation, Respondent,v.New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Appellant.

Brief

15 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical

    810 F.2d 726 (8th Cir. 1986)   Cited 418 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "requiring proof of personal ownership or actual physical possession of hazardous substances as a precondition of liability . . . would be inconsistent with the broad remedial purposes of CERCLA"

  2. ASARCO LLC v. Goodwin

    756 F.3d 191 (2d Cir. 2014)   Cited 122 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Determining that a newly added claim in an amended complaint did not relate back because the original complaint "contained no facts whatever about" the newly added claim

  3. NYC C.L.A.S.H., Inc. v. New York State Office of Parks

    2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 2479 (N.Y. 2016)   Cited 35 times

    No. 46 03-31-2016 In the Matter of NYC C.L.A.S.H., INC., Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF PARKS, RECREATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION et al., Respondents. Joshpe Law Group LLP, New York City (Edward A. Paltzik of counsel), and Law Offices of Yan Margolin, New York City (Yan Margolin of counsel), for appellant. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Victor Paladino, Barbara D. Underwood and Andrea Oser of counsel), for respondents. FAHEY, J. Joshpe Law Group LLP, New York City (Edward

  4. New York State Superfund Coal., Inc. v. New York State Dep't of Envtl. Conservation

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8996 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 39 times

    2011-12-15 In the Matter of NEW YORK STATE SUPERFUND COALITION, INC., Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION et al., Respondents. Hiscock & Barclay, LLP, Rochester (Thomas F. Walsh, Thomas J. Warth and Danielle E. Mettler of counsel), for appellant. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Andrew B. Ayers, Barbara D. Underwood and Denise A. Hartman of counsel), for respondents. JONES Hiscock & Barclay, LLP, Rochester (Thomas F. Walsh, Thomas J. Warth and Danielle

  5. Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co.

    26 N.Y.2d 219 (N.Y. 1970)   Cited 70 times
    Acknowledging that nuisance damages "effective[ly] spur" a change in behavior

  6. FMC Corp. v. N.Y.S. Dep't of Envtl. Conservation

    151 A.D.3d 1416 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)   Cited 5 times

    06-22-2017 In the Matter of FMC CORPORATION, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, Respondent. Hodgson Russ, LLP, Buffalo (David G. Mandelbaum of Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, admitted pro hac vice), for appellant. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Frederick A. Brodie of counsel), for respondent. AARONS, J. Hodgson Russ, LLP, Buffalo (David G. Mandelbaum of Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, admitted pro hac vice)

  7. Nguyen v. Holder

    2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 7290 (N.Y. 2014)

    10-28-2014 HUYEN V. Nguyen, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., United States Attorney General, Respondent. Michael E. Marszalkowski, P.C., Buffalo (Michael E. Marszalkowski of counsel), for petitioner. United States Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C. (Michael C. Heyse, Stuart F. Delery and Mary Jane Candaux of counsel), for respondent. Michael E. Marszalkowski, P.C., Buffalo (Michael E. Marszalkowski of counsel), for petitioner. United States Department of

  8. Matter of Lashins Arcade Co. v. Jorling

    221 A.D.2d 533 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)   Cited 1 times

    November 20, 1995 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.). Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. In 1978, the Westchester County Department of Health determined that groundwater in the area of property owned by the petitioner Lashins Arcade Co. (hereinafter Lashins) in the Town of Bedford, known as the Shopping Arcade, was contaminated. It is alleged that groundwater is the sole source of water supply to the residents of the area. Testing conducted

  9. Matter of Estes

    15 B.R. 25 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1981)   Cited 4 times

    Bankruptcy No. 3-80-03222. Adv. No. 3-80-0721. August 18, 1981. A. J. Wagner, Kettering, Ohio, for plaintiff. Keith R. Hall, Dayton, Ohio, for defendant. Herbert Ernst, Jr., Dayton, Ohio, trustee. CHARLES A. ANDERSON, Bankruptcy Judge. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT This matter is before the Court for disposition of the plaintiff-debtor's complaint, filed as a motion on February 19, 1981 and amended on February 26, 1981, to determine whether defendant has violated 11 U.S.C. § 362 by repossessing collateral

  10. Anderson v. Hayes Const. Co.

    243 N.Y. 140 (N.Y. 1926)   Cited 80 times
    In Anderson v. John L. Hayes Construction Co., 1926, 243 N.Y. 140, 147, 153 N.E. 28, 29, Judge Cardozo stated: ‘ The exemption of the sovereign from suit involves hardship enough where consent has been withheld.

  11. Section 9607 - Liability

    42 U.S.C. § 9607   Cited 3,269 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding certain listed persons strictly "liable" for specified cleanup costs

  12. Section 6928 - Federal enforcement

    42 U.S.C. § 6928   Cited 343 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing civil actions by the EPA Administrator

  13. Section 6973 - Imminent hazard

    42 U.S.C. § 6973   Cited 234 times
    Authorizing administrator to bring suit

  14. Section 6926 - Authorized State hazardous waste programs

    42 U.S.C. § 6926   Cited 186 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing state programs so long as they are “equivalent to” and “consistent with” RCRA's regulations

  15. Section 375-2.11 - Miscellaneous

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 6 § 375-2.11   Cited 4 times

    (a) Prohibitions. (1) Except in the event of an emergency, in which event the remedial party shall comply with section 375-1.5(b)(1) of this Part, no person shall undertake at a site listed in the Registry any physical alteration that constitutes storage, treatment, or disposal of any contaminant which served as the basis for such listing, unless such conduct: (i) is exempted under section 373-1.1(d) of this Title or permitted under Part 373 of this Title, including corrective action under section