§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Ryan P. Brahney, Appellant.

Brief

9 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Laureano

    87 N.Y.2d 640 (N.Y. 1996)   Cited 345 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Construing N.Y. Penal Law § 70.25

  2. People v. Ramirez

    89 N.Y.2d 444 (N.Y. 1996)   Cited 174 times
    Upholding consecutive robbery sentences where the defendant forcibly took the belongings of two security guards in a hotel parking lot

  3. People v. McKnight

    16 N.Y.3d 43 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 78 times
    In People v McKnight (16 NY3d 43 [2010]), we applied the Laureano framework to assess the legality of consecutive sentencing in the context of an attempted crime.

  4. People v. Frazier

    2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 9159 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 44 times

    No. 215. Argued November 15, 2010. Decided December 14, 2010. CROSS APPEALS, by permission of an Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, entered January 13, 2009. The Appellate Division modified, on the law, a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Rena K. Uviller, J., at competency hearing; Charles J. Tejada, J., at jury trial and sentencing), which had convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict

  5. People v. Larew

    11 A.D.3d 727 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)   Cited 4 times

    14531 October 21, 2004. Lahtinen, J. Appeal, by permission, from an order of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Nicandri, J.) entered December 16, 2002, which denied defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.20 to set aside the sentence following his conviction of the crimes of attempted murder in the second degree and burglary in the first degree (four counts), without a hearing. Before: Crew III, J.P., Peters, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Following his 1993 conviction of the crimes of

  6. People v. McCloud

    182 A.D.2d 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)   Cited 14 times

    April 27, 1992 Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Doolittle, J., Harrington, J.). Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by providing that the terms of imprisonment imposed on the convictions for burglary in the first degree shall run concurrently with the terms of imprisonment imposed on all of the convictions for robbery in the first degree; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed; and it is further, Ordered that the order is affirmed. On the evening of February 8, 1985,

  7. People v. Fulton

    257 A.D.2d 774 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)   Cited 6 times

    January 14, 1999. Appeal from the County Court of Sullivan County (Kane, J.). After David Greenzweig's body was discovered in the basement of a building he owned in the Town of Fallsburg, Sullivan County, the police sought defendant, who had been working for Greenzweig as a handyman, for questioning regarding the apparent robbery homicide. Defendant was located in Key West, Florida, and informed of the existence of an outstanding warrant for his arrest on a felony charge of driving while intoxicated

  8. People v. Anderson

    254 A.D.2d 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)   Cited 6 times

    October 2, 1998 Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J. — Attempted Murder, 2nd Degree. Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Hayes, Pigott, Jr., and Callahan, JJ. Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: County Court erred in directing that the sentence imposed on count one, attempted murder in the second degree ( see, Penal Law § 110.00, 125.25 Penal [1]), run consecutively with the sentences imposed on counts five

  9. People v. Roman

    279 A.D.2d 485 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)   Cited 3 times

    Argued December 7, 2000 January 11, 2001. Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hanophy, J.), rendered March 2, 1999, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts, one count each of intentional murder and felony murder), intimidating a victim or witness in the first degree, burglary in the first degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (three counts), and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon