§Why CasetextPricing

Kyle Connaughton, Appellant,v.Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Brief

7 Cited authorities

  1. Stewart v. Jackson Nash

    976 F.2d 86 (2d Cir. 1992)   Cited 241 times
    Holding that plaintiff, an at-will employee, stated a claim for fraudulent inducement where here alleged injuries "commenced well before her termination and were, in several important respects, unrelated to it"

  2. Smalley v. Dreyfus Core

    2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 1252 (N.Y. 2008)   Cited 78 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding Stewart distinguishable because "plaintiffs alleged no injury separate and distinct from termination of their at-will employment"

  3. Laduzinski v. Alvarez & Marsal Taxand LLC

    132 A.D.3d 164 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)   Cited 51 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "where an at-will employee alleges an injury separate and distinct from termination of the [his] employment, he may have a cause of action for fraudulent inducement"

  4. Kwon v. Yun

    606 F. Supp. 2d 344 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)   Cited 52 times
    Permitting defendant to amend counterclaims in its pleading because defendant “would be free to file a new action” to recover on its claims

  5. Stevenson Equipment v. Chemig Construction Corporation

    79 N.Y.2d 989 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 23 times
    Upholding jury verdict of fraud when “[t]here is also evidence that defendants were aware that plaintiff was acting on the basis of a mistaken belief ... [t]his situation imposed an obligation to disclose on defendants' part”

  6. Section 3013 - Particularity of statements generally

    N.Y. CPLR 3013   Cited 1,706 times
    Describing notice pleading requirements

  7. Section 3026 - Construction

    N.Y. CPLR 3026   Cited 1,504 times
    Permitting defects in pleadings to be ignored if a substantial right of a party is not prejudiced