§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Appellant,v.Daria N. Epakchi, Respondent.

Brief

25 Cited authorities

  1. Brady v. Maryland

    373 U.S. 83 (1963)   Cited 43,423 times   133 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the prosecution violates due process when it suppresses material, favorable evidence

  2. State v. Danielson

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9814 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 9,462 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding a "legally sufficient verdict can be against the weight of the evidence"

  3. People v. Romero

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 8640 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 4,926 times

    No. 151. Argued October 18, 2006. Decided November 21, 2006. APPEAL, by permission of an Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, entered October 11, 2005. The Appellate Division affirmed a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), which had convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of two counts of murder in the second degree. People v. Romero, 22 AD3d 287, affirmed. Center

  4. People v. Bleakley

    69 N.Y.2d 490 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 11,303 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Appellate Division committed reversible error when it "avoid[ed] its exclusive statutory authority to review the weight of the evidence in criminal cases"

  5. People v. Contes

    60 N.Y.2d 620 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 11,959 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stating the standard for review of the legal sufficiency of evidence in a criminal case is whether "after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt"

  6. People v. Lane

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 8641 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 458 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that claim of insufficiency of evidence was not preserved for appellate review

  7. People v. Allen

    92 N.Y.2d 378 (N.Y. 1998)   Cited 209 times
    Finding that as long as the factual allegations are sufficiently evidentiary in character and tend to support the charges, the complaint is facially sufficient

  8. People v. Nuccio

    78 N.Y.2d 102 (N.Y. 1991)   Cited 139 times
    Rejecting statutory and double jeopardy challenges to renewal of prosecution after the dismissal of a complaint

  9. MacFawn v. Kresler

    88 N.Y.2d 859 (N.Y. 1996)   Cited 109 times
    Holding that a dismissal of the information without prejudice for facial insufficiency may not serve as the basis for a malicious prosecution claim

  10. Pultz v. Economakis

    2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 4900 (N.Y. 2008)   Cited 59 times
    In Pultz v Economakis, 10 NY3d 542, cited by the attorney for plaintiffs, a couple sought to evict the tenants in 15 rent-stabilized apartments from an East Village tenement in order to convert the 60-room tenement into their own single-family home containing a gym, a playroom, a library, five bedrooms and six bathrooms.

  11. Section 91.5 - Specifications of uniform traffic ticket

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 15 § 91.5   Cited 6 times

    Uniform traffic tickets conforming to the following specifications may be issued for traffic violations occurring prior to January 1, 1970, and must be used for traffic violations occurring on and after January 1, 1970. No variations from the prescribed specifications shall be permitted unless prior written approval is obtained from the commissioner. (a) It shall be a multi-copy packet, with interleaved carbons, conforming to the following: (1) Each part shall be between 4 and 41/4 inches wide and

  12. Section 91.18 - Police officer procedure for uniform traffic ticket (tsleand d area)

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 15 § 91.18   Cited 4 times

    When an alleged traffic violator is issued a uniform traffic ticket, the police officer shall sign and print his name on part I of the packet. Such signature constitutes the affirmation of the information under penalty of perjury. The officer shall deliver part III or part V, whichever is appropriate, to the alleged violator, and shall deliver parts I and II, with carbon still in place, to the court or traffic violations bureau in which the alleged violator is notified to appear. He shall deliver

  13. Section 500.13 - Content and form of briefs in normal course appeals

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.13

    (a) Content. All briefs shall conform to the requirements of section 500.1 of this Part and contain a table of contents, a table of cases and authorities, questions presented, point headings, and, if necessary, a disclosure statement pursuant to section 500.1(f) of this Part. Such disclosure statement shall be included before the table of contents in the party's principal brief. Appellant's brief shall include a statement showing that the court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and to review