28 Cited authorities

  1. Goshen v. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of New York

    98 N.Y.2d 314 (N.Y. 2002)   Cited 2,421 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the in-state "origin of any advertising or promotional conduct is irrelevant if the deception itself" occurred out of state and that merely "'hatching a scheme' or originating a marketing campaign in New York" is not actionable under the statute
  2. Guggenheimer v. Ginzburg

    43 N.Y.2d 268 (N.Y. 1977)   Cited 3,260 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Reversing grant of motion to dismiss
  3. Global Mins. v. Holme

    35 A.D.3d 93 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)   Cited 398 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that reliance on alleged misrepresentations was unreasonable as a matter of law
  4. Centro Empresarial Cempresa S.A. v. América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V.

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 4720 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 301 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that shareholders that had released unknown fraud claims arising out of the shareholders' ownership interest in a company could not base a rescission claim on allegations that defendants had induced the release by concealing the true value of that interest
  5. Basis Yield Alpha Fund v. Goldman Sachs Grp., Inc.

    115 A.D.3d 128 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)   Cited 231 times
    Finding certain "disclaimers and disclosures" insufficient to "preclude, as a matter of law, plaintiff's claim of justifiable reliance on [the defendant's] misrepresentations and omissions"
  6. Swersky v. Dreyer Traub

    219 A.D.2d 321 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)   Cited 280 times
    Holding that "the firm may be held liable to the same extent as the individual defendant"
  7. Schron v. Troutman Sanders LLP

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 952 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 173 times
    Affirming that “evidence outside the four corners of the document” is admissible to modify or contradict a written agreement “only if a court finds an ambiguity in the contract”
  8. HSH Nordbank AG v. UBS AG

    95 A.D.3d 185 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 150 times
    Holding that general market information or industry-wide practices do not support a fraud claim
  9. DDJ Management, LLC v. Rhone Group LLC

    2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 5603 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 153 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Suggesting that a Plaintiff "will often be justified" in accepting a written representation that certain facts are true rather than making its own inquiry
  10. Danann Realty Corp. v. Harris

    5 N.Y.2d 317 (N.Y. 1959)   Cited 649 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff is precluded from relying on oral representations to establish fraudulent inducement to enter a contract where the contract contains a specific disclaimer that the plaintiff "is not relying on any representations as to the very matter as to which it now claims it was defrauded"
  11. § 240.10b-5 Employment of manipulative and deceptive devices

    17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5   Cited 8,441 times   89 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any person who "make any untrue statement of material fact"
  12. s 500.1 - General requirements

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.1   Cited 1 times

    (a) All papers shall comply with applicable statutes and rules, particularly the signing requirement of section 130-1.1-a of this Title. (b) Papers filed. Papers filed means briefs, papers submitted pursuant to sections 500.10 and 500.11 of this Part, motion papers, records and appendices. (c) Method of reproduction. All papers filed may be reproduced by any method that produces a permanent, legible, black image on white paper. Reproduction on both sides of the paper is encouraged. (d) Designation