§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Marine Holdings, LLC, et al., Respondents,v.New York City Commission on Human Rights, Appellant, et al., Respondent.

Brief

4 Cited authorities

  1. Olmstead v. L. C

    527 U.S. 581 (1999)   Cited 908 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state engages in disability discrimination if it institutionalizes individuals with disabilities when community-based placement could be reasonably accommodated, accounting for the resources available to the state and the needs of others with disabilities.

  2. Romanello v. Intesa Sanpaolo, S.P.A.

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 6600 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 201 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff's request for “a continued leave of absence to allow him to get better and return to work” where his return to work date was indefinite was an unreasonable request for indefinite leave

  3. Marine Holdings, LLC v.

    137 A.D.3d 1284 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)   Cited 7 times

    2014-02576 2016-02313 03-30-2016 In the Matter of Marine Holdings, LLC, doing business as Marine Terrace Associates, LLC, et al., petitioners-appellants, v. New York City Commission on Human Rights, respondent-respondent, et al., respondent. Herrick, Feinstein LLP, New York, NY (Avery S. Mehlman and Jonathan L. Adler of counsel), for petitioners-appellants. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (Francis Caputo and Michael J. Pastor of counsel), for respondent-respondent. JOHN M. LEVENTHAL

  4. Section 12101 - Findings and purpose

    42 U.S.C. § 12101   Cited 23,308 times   65 Legal Analyses
    Finding a pattern of " unnecessary discrimination and prejudice" that "costs the United States billions of dollars in unnecessary expenses resulting from dependency and nonproductivity"