76 Cited authorities

  1. South Carolina v. Katzenbach

    383 U.S. 301 (1966)   Cited 601 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state is not a person entitled to due process under the fifth amendment
  2. Nebbia v. New York

    291 U.S. 502 (1934)   Cited 1,424 times
    Holding that due process is not violated if the challenged law has "a reasonable relation to a proper legislative purpose" and is "neither arbitrary nor discriminatory"
  3. Ysursa v. Pocatello Educ. Ass'n

    555 U.S. 353 (2009)   Cited 120 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Idaho's limitation on public employee payroll deductions did not implicate the First Amendment, as the prohibition simply prevented organizations from enlisting the state's support of their speech
  4. Matter of Brusco v. Braun

    84 N.Y.2d 674 (N.Y. 1994)   Cited 248 times
    In Brusco, for example, the Article 78 proceeding sought to compel the issuance of a judgment to which the Petitioner was entitled by law.
  5. American Dairy Assn. v. Rasmussen

    412 U.S. 950 (1973)   Cited 113 times

    No. 72-1471. June 18, 1973. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 472 F. 2d 517.

  6. Williams v. Mayor

    289 U.S. 36 (1933)   Cited 300 times
    Recognizing that "a subordinate unit of government created by the State to carry out delegated governmental functions" or "a political subdivision, 'created by a state for the better ordering of government, has no privileges or immunities under the federal constitution which it may invoke in opposition to the will of its creator' "
  7. Silver v. Pataki

    96 N.Y.2d 532 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 126 times
    Holding that a legislator had standing to challenge the constitutionality of the governor's veto power on the basis that a legislator "can maintain an action ‘to vindicate the effectiveness of his vote where he is alleging that the Governor has acted improperly so as to usurp or nullify that vote’ " (quoting Silver v. Pataki, 274 A.D.2d 57, 67, 711 N.Y.S.2d 402, 410 (2000)(Williams, J., dissenting))
  8. Hernandez v. Robles

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 5239 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 100 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that rational-basis scrutiny was appropriate in part because same-sex relationships "cannot lead to the birth of children"
  9. Trenton v. New Jersey

    262 U.S. 182 (1923)   Cited 350 times
    Holding that a municipality acts as an agent of the state in exercising the powers delegated to it by the state
  10. City of New York v. State

    86 N.Y.2d 286 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 101 times
    Observing "extreme reluctance of courts to intrude in the political relationships between the Legislature, the State and its governmental subdivisions"
  11. Section 601.4 - Claim adjudication

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 18 § 601.4   Cited 9 times

    The department will be responsible for examining claims for reimbursement submitted by social services districts. Initial determinations objecting to the allowability of a claim for reimbursement will be made in a timely manner not to exceed 90 days from the time of receipt by the department, unless the department notifies a district that a specified amount of additional time, not to exceed an additional 90 days, is necessary to complete examination of the claim. Any portion of a claim to which there

  12. Section 601.3 - Reimbursement claiming time limits

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 18 § 601.3   Cited 6 times

    Except as otherwise provided, to be eligible for State reimbursement, expenditures for public assistance, care and services, or for any other activity which is subject to reimbursement by the department, must be made within the time limits set forth in this section and must be included in a claim submitted by the social services district to the department for the time period in which such expenditures are claimed to have been made. (a) Claims for expenditures which are subject to reimbursement by