§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of County of Chautauqua, Appellant,v.Nirav R. Shah,, et al., Respondents.

Brief

29 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Locke

    471 U.S. 84 (1985)   Cited 670 times
    Holding that the plaintiffs’ actual intent was irrelevant to whether they satisfied a federal mining statute’s requirement to file a notice of intent to hold a mining claim by a certain date

  2. South Carolina v. Katzenbach

    383 U.S. 301 (1966)   Cited 654 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state is not a person entitled to due process under the fifth amendment

  3. American Dairy Assn. v. Rasmussen

    412 U.S. 950 (1973)   Cited 115 times

    No. 72-1471. June 18, 1973. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 472 F. 2d 517.

  4. Williams v. Mayor

    289 U.S. 36 (1933)   Cited 315 times
    Recognizing that "a subordinate unit of government created by the State to carry out delegated governmental functions" or "a political subdivision, 'created by a state for the better ordering of government, has no privileges or immunities under the federal constitution which it may invoke in opposition to the will of its creator' "

  5. Hernandez v. Robles

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 5239 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that rational-basis scrutiny was appropriate in part because same-sex relationships "cannot lead to the birth of children"

  6. Trenton v. New Jersey

    262 U.S. 182 (1923)   Cited 365 times
    Holding that a municipality acts as an agent of the state in exercising the powers delegated to it by the state

  7. City of New York v. State

    86 N.Y.2d 286 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 112 times
    Observing "extreme reluctance of courts to intrude in the political relationships between the Legislature, the State and its governmental subdivisions"

  8. Matter of Hodes v. Axelrod

    70 N.Y.2d 364 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 124 times
    Holding that the application of an amended statute permitting the revocation of a nursing home operating certificate based on an operator's industry-related felony convictions does not impair the operator's vested rights, even though the operator had successfully litigated the automatic revocation under the preexisting law

  9. Brothers v. Florence

    95 N.Y.2d 290 (N.Y. 2000)   Cited 79 times
    Holding that it was unreasonable to apply an amended statute of limitations that shortened the time in which to file medical-malpractice claims to a suit that, upon passage of the new statute of limitations, was to be filed within four months rather than within the significantly longer time under the old statute, given the diligent pursuit of the claim by the plaintiff from the time of accrual

  10. Mtr. of OnBank Trust Co.

    90 N.Y.2d 725 (N.Y. 1997)   Cited 81 times
    Finding that a portion of Banking Law § 100–c would be meaningless if applied prospectively only, given the statute's reference to EPTL § 11–2.2(b), which contains a specific date, thus warranting a retroactive application of the statute

  11. Section 601.4 - Claim adjudication

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 18 § 601.4   Cited 9 times

    The department will be responsible for examining claims for reimbursement submitted by social services districts. Initial determinations objecting to the allowability of a claim for reimbursement will be made in a timely manner not to exceed 90 days from the time of receipt by the department, unless the department notifies a district that a specified amount of additional time, not to exceed an additional 90 days, is necessary to complete examination of the claim. Any portion of a claim to which there