§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Empire Center for New York State Policy, Appellant,v.New York State Teachers' Retirement System, Respondent.

Brief

10 Cited authorities

  1. Henslee v. Union Planters Bank

    335 U.S. 595 (1949)   Cited 299 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Henslee the testator authorized the trustees to "expend in their discretion any portion of my estate, either income or principal, for the pleasure, comfort and welfare of my mother."

  2. Buffalo News v. Buffalo Enter

    84 N.Y.2d 488 (N.Y. 1994)   Cited 74 times
    Holding a not-for-profit corporation that administered loan programs and encouraged community development, though not subject to substantial governmental control over its daily operations, was still a "government entity" performing a governmental function and thus an "agency" subject to FOIL

  3. Schenectady Cnty. Soc'y for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Inc. v. Mills

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 7476 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 40 times

    2011-10-25 In the Matter of SCHENECTADY COUNTY SOCIETY FOR the PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS, INC., Respondent, v. Richard P. MILLS, as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, Appellant. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Frank K. Walsh, Barbara D. Underwood and Andrew D. Bing of counsel), for appellant. Tully Rinckey, PLLC, Albany (Mathew B. Tully, Greg T. Rinckey, Steven L. Herrick, Constantine F. DeStefano, Scott T. Dillon, Andrew L. McNamara and Michael W. Macomber

  4. In re N.Y.S.U.T

    2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 8383 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 21 times

    No. 181. Argued October 13, 2010. Decided November 18, 2010. APPEAL, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, entered July 30, 2009. The Appellate Division affirmed a judgment of the Supreme Court, Albany County (Roger D. McDonough, J), entered in a hybrid CPLR article 78 proceeding and declaratory judgment action, which had (1) granted the petition to the extent of adjudging that petitioner was entitled

  5. Empire Ctr. for N.Y. State Policy v. N.Y. Teachers' Ret. Sys.

    103 A.D.3d 1009 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 7 times

    2013-02-21 In the Matter of EMPIRE CENTER FOR NEW YORK STATE POLICY, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent. Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, LLP, New York City (Alia L. Smith of counsel), for appellant. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Jeffrey W. Lang of counsel), for respondent. PETERS Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, LLP, New York City (Alia L. Smith of counsel), for appellant. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Jeffrey W. Lang of counsel)

  6. The Empire Ctr. for N.Y. State Policy v. N.Y. City Police Pension Fund

    88 A.D.3d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 6 times

    2011-10-18 The EMPIRE CENTER FOR NEW YORK STATE POLICY, etc., Petitioner–Appellant,v.NEW YORK CITY POLICE PENSION FUND, Respondent–Respondent. Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, LLP, New York (David A. Schulz of counsel), for appellant.Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Elizabeth I. Freedman of counsel), for respondent. GONZALEZ, P.J., TOM, FRIEDMAN, CATTERSON, RICHTER, JJ. Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, LLP, New York (David A. Schulz of counsel), for appellant.Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation

  7. Rifle Clubs v. Police Dept

    73 N.Y.2d 92 (N.Y. 1989)   Cited 25 times
    In Matter of Federation of N.Y. State Rifle Pistol Clubs v New York City Police Dept. (73 NY2d 92), an organization requested the names and addresses of rifle and shotgun permit holders so it could mail them circulars describing its organization, its pursuits and the services it performed on behalf of its members, along with information concerning the organization's annual membership dues (see id. at 96).

  8. Empire Ctr. for N.Y. State Policy v. Teachers' Ret. Sys. of the City of N.Y.

    103 A.D.3d 593 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

    2013-02-28 In re EMPIRE CENTER FOR NEW YORK STATE POLICY, Petitioner–Appellant, v. TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF the CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent–Respondent. Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, LLP, New York (David A. Schulz of counsel), for appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Elizabeth I. Freedman of counsel), for respondent. Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, LLP, New York (David A. Schulz of counsel), for appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Elizabeth

  9. Matter of N.Y. Veteran Police Assn. v. N.Y. Ct. Police

    61 N.Y.2d 659 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 15 times
    In Matter of New York Veteran Police Assn. v New York City Police Dept. Art. I Pension Fund (61 NY2d 659), the Court of Appeals held that Public Officers Law § 89(7) exempts from disclosure both the names and addresses of retirees of the New York City Police Department receiving pensions and annuities.

  10. Teachers Assn v. Ret. System

    71 A.D.2d 250 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)   Cited 18 times

    December 4, 1979 Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County, SHANLEY N. EGETH, J. Jeffrey D. Friedlander of counsel (L. Kevin Sheridan, Paul T. Rephen and Thomas R. Nathan with him on the brief; Allen G. Schwartz, Corporation Counsel), for appellant. Howard N. Meyer for respondents. SULLIVAN, J. This is an article 78 proceeding in the nature of mandamus to compel disclosure of the names and home addresses of retired New York City school teachers from the Teachers' Retirement System of the City