§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Clinton Johnson, Appellant.

Brief

4 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Taranovich

    37 N.Y.2d 442 (N.Y. 1975)   Cited 988 times
    In People v. Taranovich, 37 N.Y.2d 442 (1975), the New York Court of Appeals adopted a substantially similar balancing test, using the following factors: "(1) the extent of the delay; (2) the reason for the delay; (3) the nature of the underlying charge; (4) whether or not there has been an extended period of pretrial incarceration; and (5) whether or not there is any indication that the defense has been impaired by reason of the delay."

  2. People v. Johnson

    134 A.D.3d 1388 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)   Cited 14 times

    1042 KA 12-01597. 12-23-2015 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Clinton JOHNSON, Defendant–Appellant. Frank H. Hiscock Legal Aid Society, Syracuse (Evan Hannay of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. William J. Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, Syracuse (James P. Maxwell of Counsel), for Respondent. Frank H. Hiscock Legal Aid Society, Syracuse (Evan Hannay of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. William J. Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, Syracuse (James P. Maxwell of Counsel), for Respondent

  3. People v. Velez

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7656 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 6 times

    2013-11-19 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Julio VELEZ, Appellant. Mark Diamond, New York City, for appellant. Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains (Steven A. Bender and Richard Longworth Hecht of counsel), for respondent. Mark Diamond, New York City, for appellant.Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains (Steven A. Bender and Richard Longworth Hecht of counsel), for respondent. OPINION OF THE COURT MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed

  4. Section 500.11 - Alternative procedure for selected appeals

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.11   Cited 536 times

    (a) On its own motion, the court may review selected appeals by an alternative procedure. Such appeals shall be determined on the intermediate appellate court record or appendix and briefs, the writings in the courts below and additional letter submissions on the merits. The clerk of the court shall notify all parties by letter when an appeal has been selected for review pursuant to this section. Appellant may request such review in its preliminary appeal statement. Respondent may request such review