§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Phillip A. Dodson, Appellant.

Brief

19 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Lopez

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 1195 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 3,892 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an appeal waiver encompasses "any issue that does not involve a right of constitutional dimension going to "the very heart of the process," and ruling that a valid appeal waiver precludes review of claims that a sentence is harsh or excessive

  2. Pointer v. Texas

    380 U.S. 400 (1965)   Cited 4,297 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “the Sixth Amendment's right of an accused to confront the witnesses against him is likewise a fundamental right and is made obligatory on the States by the Fourteenth Amendment”

  3. People v. Gonzalez

    47 N.Y.2d 606 (N.Y. 1979)   Cited 6,016 times
    Remanding to the Appellate Division for de novo consideration of the appeal following High v. Rhay, 519 F.2d 109, 113 (9th Cir. 1975)

  4. People v. Bradshaw

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8963 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 1,391 times
    Requiring colloquy before accepting waivers of right to appeal

  5. People v. Hansen

    95 N.Y.2d 227 (N.Y. 2000)   Cited 444 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, by pleading guilty, the defendant had forfeited his right to challenge the prosecutor's submission of hearsay evidence to the grand jury

  6. People v. Linares

    2 N.Y.3d 507 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 296 times
    Affirming conviction and rejecting defendant's argument that he was entitled to a new trial because he was denied substitute counsel after he threatened his attorney, who nonetheless proceeded to represent him

  7. People v. Mitchell

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 4274 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 150 times

    2013-06-11 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert MITCHELL, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Josue Deliser, Appellant. Richard M. Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York City (Rebekah J. Pazmiño of counsel), for appellant in the first above-entitled action. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Richard J. Ramsay, Joseph N. Ferdenzi and Peter D. Coddington of counsel), for respondent in the first above-entitled action. Richard

  8. People v. Medina

    44 N.Y.2d 199 (N.Y. 1978)   Cited 290 times
    In Medina, however, we articulated two clear-cut instances in which a trial court's failure to find good cause for substitution would amount to an abuse of discretion: first, when an attorney is assigned to represent two defendants between whom there is a conflict of interest and second, when the defense counsel has "not adequately investigated his client's history of mental disorder" (id. at 208).

  9. People v. Arroyave

    49 N.Y.2d 264 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 224 times
    In People v Arroyave (49 N.Y.2d 264), the Court of Appeals observed that "[w]hether a continuance should be granted is largely within the discretion of the Trial Judge * * * and the question of whether a defendant has been denied his right to retain counsel of his own choosing can only be answered by examining the particular facts of each case" (People v Arroyave, supra, at 271).

  10. State v. Moyett

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 8643 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 87 times

    No. SSM 30. Decided November 21, 2006. APPEAL, by permission of an Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, entered August 11, 2005. The Appellate Division affirmed a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Roger S. Hayes, J.), which had convicted defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentenced him, as a second felony offender, to a term of imprisonment of 10 years.