Crystallex International Corp. v. Petroleos DE Venezuela, S.A. et al
MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Subject Matter , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Person , MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim -
Holding appellant's claims were barred by claim preclusion because he “was well aware of all of the operative facts prior to” filing his amended complaint
Holding that a negligent misrepresentation claim was unaffected by the ministerial exception because its resolution "does not turn on the lawfulness of the decision to restructure, but rather upon the truth or falsity of the assurances that she would be evaluated on her merits" and that the breach of contract claim could also move forward because enforcement "in no way constitutes a state-imposed limit upon a church's free exercise rights," although it would be subject to an evaluation of whether resolution "required inquiry into the church's ecclesiastical policy"
Holding that, in assessing FSIA jurisdiction, district court should "review the allegations in the complaint, the undisputed facts, if any, placed before it by the parties, and—if the plaintiff comes forward with sufficient evidence to carry its burden of production on this issue—resolve disputed issues of fact, with the defendant foreign sovereign shouldering the burden of persuasion"
Holding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in denying discovery where "the pleadings contained no allegations of specific facts that could establish the requisite contacts with the District"