§Why CasetextPricing

CoStar Realty Information, Inc. et al v. Mark Field, et al

RESPONSE in Opposition re MOTION for Summary Judgment As to Defendant Gressett and Cross Motion for Summary Judgment

38 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 237,946 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc.

    530 U.S. 133 (2000)   Cited 21,260 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, since the 58-year-old plaintiff was fired by his 60-year-old employer, there was an inference that "age discrimination was not the motive"

  3. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Service Co.

    499 U.S. 340 (1991)   Cited 3,427 times   45 Legal Analyses
    Holding "it is beyond dispute that compilations of facts are within the subject matter of copyright" even though "copyright protects only the author's original contributions—not the facts or information conveyed"

  4. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.

    545 U.S. 913 (2005)   Cited 794 times   31 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “one who distributes a device with the object of promoting its use to infringe copyright ... is liable”

  5. Shaw v. Stroud

    13 F.3d 791 (4th Cir. 1994)   Cited 3,448 times
    Holding that supervisory liability exists only where a supervisor was aware that his or her subordinate was acting to violate a plaintiff's rights and acted with deliberate indifference in the face of that knowledge

  6. Sessions Tank Liners, Inc. v. Joor Manufacturing, Inc.

    513 U.S. 813 (1994)   Cited 278 times
    Holding supervisory liability under Section 1983 cannot be premised on respondeat superior

  7. ATT CO. v. WINBACK AND CONSERVE PROGRAM, INC

    42 F.3d 1421 (3d Cir. 1994)   Cited 895 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party must produce sufficient evidence of all four factors prior to granting injunctive relief

  8. Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.Com, Inc.

    487 F.3d 701 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 470 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an online image search index was "highly transformative"

  9. Kosakow v. New Rochelle Radiology Associates

    274 F.3d 706 (2d Cir. 2001)   Cited 500 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that reasonable factfinder could conclude setting up and testing X-ray processing machine was integral and indispensable because machine must be in its ready-to-use state for patients arriving at start of day

  10. Lyons Partnership, L.P. v. Morris Costumes

    243 F.3d 789 (4th Cir. 2001)   Cited 305 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the similarity of child-oriented works must be viewed from the perspective of the child audience for which the products were intended"

  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 331,402 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  12. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,480 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system

  13. Section 1030 - Fraud and related activity in connection with computers

    18 U.S.C. § 1030   Cited 3,270 times   408 Legal Analyses
    Holding cellular phones are protected