§Why CasetextPricing

CoStar Realty Information, Inc. et al v. Mark Field, et al

RESPONSE in Opposition re MOTION for Summary Judgment As to Defendant Gressett and Cross Motion for Summary Judgment

38 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 243,884 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is appropriate when the evidence is "so one-sided that one party must prevail as a matter of law"

  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc.

    530 U.S. 133 (2000)   Cited 21,734 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding "a weak issue of fact as to whether the employer's reason was untrue" is insufficient

  3. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Service Co.

    499 U.S. 340 (1991)   Cited 3,615 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding "it is beyond dispute that compilations of facts are within the subject matter of copyright" even though "copyright protects only the author's original contributions—not the facts or information conveyed"

  4. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.

    545 U.S. 913 (2005)   Cited 815 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “one who distributes a device with the object of promoting its use to infringe copyright ... is liable”

  5. Shaw v. Stroud

    13 F.3d 791 (4th Cir. 1994)   Cited 3,603 times
    Holding that supervisory liability exists only where a supervisor was aware that his or her subordinate was acting to violate a plaintiff's rights and acted with deliberate indifference in the face of that knowledge

  6. Sessions Tank Liners, Inc. v. Joor Manufacturing, Inc.

    513 U.S. 813 (1994)   Cited 283 times
    Holding supervisory liability under Section 1983 cannot be premised on respondeat superior

  7. ATT CO. v. WINBACK AND CONSERVE PROGRAM, INC

    42 F.3d 1421 (3d Cir. 1994)   Cited 950 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party must produce sufficient evidence of all four factors prior to granting injunctive relief

  8. Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.Com, Inc.

    487 F.3d 701 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 497 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an online image search index was "highly transformative"

  9. Kosakow v. New Rochelle Radiology Associates

    274 F.3d 706 (2d Cir. 2001)   Cited 510 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that reasonable factfinder could conclude setting up and testing X-ray processing machine was integral and indispensable because machine must be in its ready-to-use state for patients arriving at start of day

  10. Lyons Partnership, L.P. v. Morris Costumes

    243 F.3d 789 (4th Cir. 2001)   Cited 313 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the similarity of child-oriented works must be viewed from the perspective of the child audience for which the products were intended"

  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 340,020 times   164 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  12. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 23,925 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Providing for service via CM/ECF Systems

  13. Section 1030 - Fraud and related activity in connection with computers

    18 U.S.C. § 1030   Cited 3,417 times   410 Legal Analyses
    Holding cellular phones are protected