21 Cited authorities

Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex Hospital
425 U.S. 738 (1976) Cited 6,315 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that a conspiracy against a North Carolina hospital had "a substantial effect on interstate commerce," and hence was covered by the Sherman Act, because it could, inter alia, reduce the hospital's purchases of out-of-state medicines and supplies
Doe v. Unocal Corp.
248 F.3d 915 (9th Cir. 2001) Cited 944 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding "court may consider evidence" on motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)
Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.
327 U.S. 251 (1946) Cited 981 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that when the plaintiff cannot prove his damages by precise computation, the jury "may make a just and reasonable estimate of the damage based on relevant data, and render its verdict accordingly"
In re Magnetic Audiotape Antitrust Litig.
334 F.3d 204 (2d Cir. 2003) Cited 456 times
Holding a defendant's level of participation in a conspiracy targeting residents in a forum may satisfy the Calder effects test
GTE New Media Services Inc. v. BellSouth Corp.
199 F.3d 1343 (D.C. Cir. 2000) Cited 480 times
Holding that personal jurisdiction could not be based upon "mere accessibility to an Internet site in the District" where defendants had "no other contacts with the District of Columbia"
Action Embroidery v. Atl. Embroidery
368 F.3d 1174 (9th Cir. 2004) Cited 371 times
Holding that, "under Section 12 of the Clayton Act, the existence of personal jurisdiction over an antitrust defendant does not depend upon there being proper venue in that court"
Allred v. Moore Peterson
117 F.3d 278 (5th Cir. 1997) Cited 314 times
Holding that service of the alleged illegal process did not establish personal jurisdiction in Mississippi
Chrysler Corp. v. Fedders Corp.
643 F.2d 1229 (6th Cir. 1981) Cited 377 times
Holding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in failing to permit discovery on jurisdictional facts because the plaintiff had offered no factual basis for its jurisdiction claims, but acknowledging that discovery "may have been advisable"
U.S. v. Employing Plasterers Assn
347 U.S. 186 (1954) Cited 185 times
Holding that dismissal of case for failure to succinctly set forth evidential facts is rarely warranted where the plaintiff sets forth requirements for recovery under claimed cause of action
Busch v. Buchman, Buchman O'Brien, Law Firm
11 F.3d 1255 (5th Cir. 1994) Cited 143 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "when a federal court is attempting to exercise personal jurisdiction over a defendant in a suit based upon a federal statute providing for nationwide service of process, the relevant inquiry is whether the defendant has had minimum contacts with the United States"
Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Cited 351,086 times 937 Legal Analyses
Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
Rule 4 - Summons
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 Cited 70,485 times 126 Legal Analyses
Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time
Section 15 - Suits by persons injured
15 U.S.C. § 15 Cited 5,712 times 35 Legal Analyses
Granting private right of action to anyone who has been injured "by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws ..."
Section 22 - District in which to sue corporation
15 U.S.C. § 22 Cited 728 times 1 Legal Analyses
Providing for venue where the defendant is "an inhabitant," "may be found," or "transacts business"

Corr Wireless Communications, L.L.C. et al v. AT&T, Inc. et al

21 Cited authorities

Holding that a conspiracy against a North Carolina hospital had "a substantial effect on interstate commerce," and hence was covered by the Sherman Act, because it could, inter alia, reduce the hospital's purchases of out-of-state medicines and supplies

Holding "court may consider evidence" on motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)

Holding that when the plaintiff cannot prove his damages by precise computation, the jury "may make a just and reasonable estimate of the damage based on relevant data, and render its verdict accordingly"

Holding a defendant's level of participation in a conspiracy targeting residents in a forum may satisfy the Calder effects test

Holding that personal jurisdiction could not be based upon "mere accessibility to an Internet site in the District" where defendants had "no other contacts with the District of Columbia"

Holding that, "under Section 12 of the Clayton Act, the existence of personal jurisdiction over an antitrust defendant does not depend upon there being proper venue in that court"

Holding that service of the alleged illegal process did not establish personal jurisdiction in Mississippi

Holding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in failing to permit discovery on jurisdictional facts because the plaintiff had offered no factual basis for its jurisdiction claims, but acknowledging that discovery "may have been advisable"

Holding that dismissal of case for failure to succinctly set forth evidential facts is rarely warranted where the plaintiff sets forth requirements for recovery under claimed cause of action

Holding that "when a federal court is attempting to exercise personal jurisdiction over a defendant in a suit based upon a federal statute providing for nationwide service of process, the relevant inquiry is whether the defendant has had minimum contacts with the United States"

Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time

Granting private right of action to anyone who has been injured "by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws ..."

Providing for venue where the defendant is "an inhabitant," "may be found," or "transacts business"