§Why CasetextPricing

Corr Wireless Communications, L.L.C. et al v. AT&T, Inc. et al

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order Denying Motion for Jurisdictional Discovery.

17 Cited authorities

  1. Calder v. Jones

    465 U.S. 783 (1984)   Cited 4,614 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding a California court had personal jurisdiction over individual defendants when the defendants had not visited the state in connection with an allegedly defamatory article and "[we]re not responsible for the circulation of the article in California"

  2. Metcalfe v. Renaissance Marine

    566 F.3d 324 (3d Cir. 2009)   Cited 650 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the plaintiffs ought to have the opportunity to conduct personal discovery, where the plaintiffs' claim was not frivolous and they were "faced with the difficult task of trying to establish personal jurisdiction over a corporation"

  3. Guidry v. U.S. Tobacco Company, Inc.

    188 F.3d 619 (5th Cir. 1999)   Cited 540 times
    Holding plaintiff must establish personal jurisdiction over a defendant individually and not as part of a conspiracy

  4. In re Magnetic Audiotape Antitrust Litig.

    334 F.3d 204 (2d Cir. 2003)   Cited 450 times
    Holding a defendant's level of participation in a conspiracy targeting residents in a forum may satisfy the Calder effects test

  5. Fielding v. Hubert Burda Media, Inc.

    415 F.3d 419 (5th Cir. 2005)   Cited 263 times
    Holding Texas courts lacked specific jurisdiction over German and New York companies that allegedly defamed German residents in magazine article

  6. Wyatt v. Kaplan

    686 F.2d 276 (5th Cir. 1982)   Cited 485 times
    Upholding court's decision not to permit depositions on motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction

  7. Textor v. Board of Regents of N. Ill. Univ

    711 F.2d 1387 (7th Cir. 1983)   Cited 213 times
    Holding that delay is a sufficient basis to deny a leave to amend only if the delay caused undue prejudice to the opposing party

  8. Black v. Acme Markets, Inc.

    564 F.2d 681 (5th Cir. 1977)   Cited 146 times
    In Black, although the Court relied upon unrelated contacts, the anti-trust cause of action was treated analogously to one involving tortious conduct, and the defendant's conduct was alleged to have caused damage in Texas.

  9. Asevedo v. NBCUniversal Media, LLC

    921 F. Supp. 2d 573 (E.D. La. 2013)   Cited 26 times
    Noting that the general rule is that venue must be established for each separate cause of action alleged in the complaint

  10. Thomas v. Kadish

    748 F.2d 276 (5th Cir. 1984)   Cited 48 times
    Holding that Rooker-Feldman does require a federal court to abstain from hearing claims inextricably intertwined with a judgment from a judicial type hearing if the administrative body was controlled by, or was an agent of, the state court system

  11. Rule 72 - Magistrate Judges: Pretrial Order

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 72   Cited 166,424 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Granting a party fourteen days to object to a Magistrate Judge's non-dispositive order