§Why CasetextPricing

Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. v. Apple, Inc.

REPLY to Response to Motion re SEALED PATENT MOTION To Compel Deposition Testimony Under Rule 30

3 Cited authorities

  1. Roberts v. Heim

    130 F.R.D. 424 (N.D. Cal. 1989)   Cited 15 times
    Recognizing a broad spectrum of contention interrogatories, and noting it is "not possible to announce in advance a hard and fast rule as to the exact amount of detail a party has to supply in response to a contention interrogatory"

  2. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,753 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system

  3. Rule 30 - Depositions by Oral Examination

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 30   Cited 16,547 times   131 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a district court's decision not to consider the plaintiff's deposition errata sheets in opposition to a motion for summary judgment when they were untimely