§Why CasetextPricing

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Frederick J. Hanna & Associates, P.C. et al

RESPONSE re MOTION for Interlocutory Review [43] Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim

10 Cited authorities

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Loan Corp.

    337 U.S. 541 (1949)   Cited 7,651 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 1291 permits appeals from certain decisions "collateral to rights asserted in the action," even when there's no final judgment

  2. McFarlin v. Conseco Services, LLC

    381 F.3d 1251 (11th Cir. 2004)   Cited 408 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certification is proper "only in exceptional cases where a decision of the appeal may avoid protracted and expensive litigation . . . and there is serious doubt as to how [a dispositive question] should be decided"

  3. Flor v. BOT Financial Corp. (In re Flor)

    79 F.3d 281 (2d Cir. 1996)   Cited 351 times
    Holding a denial of confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan is interlocutory and reasoning that the Second Circuit's holding in Maiorino v. Branford Savings Bank, a Chapter 13 case, “applies with comparable force” in the Chapter 11 context

  4. Lynn v. Monarch Recovery Mgmt., Inc.

    953 F. Supp. 2d 612 (D. Md. 2013)   Cited 127 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding for purposes of § 1292(b), the litigants' positions are irrelevant; what matters is whether there is a difference of opinion among the courts

  5. Max Daetwyler Corp. v. Meyer

    575 F. Supp. 280 (E.D. Pa. 1983)   Cited 85 times

    Civ. A. No. 81-4712. December 8, 1983. Manny D. Pokotilow, Caesar, Rivise, Bernstein Cohen, Ltd., Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff. Robert C. Podwill, Wolf, Block, Schorr Solis-Cohen, Philadelphia, Pa., Peter T. Cobrin, Stempler Cobrin, New York City, for defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge. On April 13, 1983, I entered an Order denying defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of in personam jurisdiction. In a Memorandum, 560 F. Supp. 869, accompanying that Order I found that

  6. Taylor v. Quall

    471 F. Supp. 2d 1053 (C.D. Cal. 2007)   Cited 17 times
    Rejecting contention that "there is some general standard under the FDCPA for adequate attorney involvement in debt collection actions"

  7. Southern Pilot Insurance v. CECS, Inc.

    15 F. Supp. 3d 1335 (N.D. Ga. 2013)

    Civil Action No. 1:11–CV–03863–AT. 2013-05-13 SOUTHERN PILOT INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff, v. CECS, INC., et al., Defendants, v. Michael Dillon and Little and Smith, Inc., Third–Party Defendants. Adam Charles Joffe, R. Tyler Bryant, Robert Malcolm Darroch, Stephanie F. Glickauf, Goodman McGuffey Lindsey & Johnson, Atlanta, GA, Plaintiff. James Glenn Richardson, Talley Richardson & Cable, P.A., Dallas, GA, Lawrence J. LoRusso, Rebecca L. Sample, LoRusso Law Firm, P.C., Jennifer Suzanne Ivey, Linley Jones

  8. Section 1291 - Final decisions of district courts

    28 U.S.C. § 1291   Cited 88,759 times   138 Legal Analyses
    Granting jurisdiction to the courts of appeals from final decisions of federal district courts "except where a direct review may be had in the Supreme Court"

  9. Section 1292 - Interlocutory decisions

    28 U.S.C. § 1292   Cited 22,306 times   193 Legal Analyses
    Granting appellate jurisdiction over the denial of an injunction

  10. Section 5517 - Limitations on authorities of the Bureau; preservation of authorities

    12 U.S.C. § 5517   Cited 26 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Describing the general exclusion from CFPB jurisdiction for accountants and tax preparers